Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why would Mitch McConnell assert that banning earmark spending would not reduce the federal budget?

Jim DeMint and President Obama are on board.....McConnell claims it is "complicated"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_mcconnell_earmarks

Update:

Discretionary spending is apparently about a third of all federal spending. Any cuts have to help balance the budget, right?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • meg
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because now the Republicans get to control the Earmarks. He is not far from being right, they are a very small part of total spending, but he did not say it was complicated when it was an issue the Republicans could use against the democrats.

    He is now also promising to "end Obama's bailouts". He seems to have forgotten that they were proposed and signed by Bush and that he voted for them.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    all of them seem so hypocritical. this is not the earmarks it extremely is elevating our debt. it particularly is a mixture of Tax Cuts for the wealthy, conflict Spending and Entitlement spending jointly and without important artwork on those 3 reducing earmarks is basically the thank you to get votes from people who understand not greater suitable. McConnell is being a Hypocrite and as much as i'm a Democrat, I could say all of them seem, different than for some. I wish shall all of us come jointly to restoration issues fairly of each and all of the detest. that should make my sacrifices in the conflict nicely worth it!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Earmarks make up such a small piece. The move is largely symbolic, though I support the ban. Trying to get everyone on board will be interesting.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well it really wouldn't. You may see millions on earmarks but America has a multi trillion a year budget. On the grand scheme of things that's not much at all.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • While earmarks make fun soundbites, all earmarks together add up to an insignificant fraction of the Federal Budget.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Because - like Republicans when they are in power - they LOVE earmarks.

    Republicans LOVE spending money even more than Democrats!

    These guys are screaming about cutting SOCIAL programs - but they are talking about INCREASING the Military Budget!

    See?

    It's just a different kind of spending.

    GOP - spend BILLIONS on the Military Industrial Complex - get kickbacks.

    GOP - spend BILLIONS on the MIddle Class - get zippo.

    It's really quite simple.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They are trying to defend Porkulus.

    "No Pork Barrel Spending." REMEMBER THAT

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    DO you know the percentage of budget that it may be? There is your answer.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Because he knows that cutting the funding for one thing will mean more money spent somewhere else!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.