Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are strip searches and groping at air ports a violation on the 4th amendment?
“ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ”
Does the TSA have probable cause for every person boarding a flight?
18 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
No because I don't have to fly. I will say this though, the terrorists are beating us when we're willing to change our way of life and put up with being violated at air ports. There should be a full on boycott by citizens of intrusive airport screenings.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Yes and I think that the argument should hinge on whether or not such searches are reasonable....and I don't think they are.
If searching my person prior to immediately boarding an aircraft is reasonable then so is searching my person prior to my entering the terminal , the airport property or any of the long term lots.
So why don't have our persons searched in those other three places ?
- 1 decade ago
Scanning for explosives and weapons? No probable cause but court approval.
Hand on my testicles? Hell NO.
And please don't blame the TSA agent. He/she is "following orders."
It's the fing idiots in D.C.
If you object they'll pull you out of line and you miss your flight. If you get angry you'll
probably wind up in the pokey.
About time someone in DC gets the message. Quit feeling up the flying public.
- hardwoodrodsLv 61 decade ago
They are not a violation of the 4th amendment simply because the search has not been deemed unreasonable by the court. Unreasonable would be if certain people were singled out, if everyone is searched the same way, it is not unreasonable.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- RandyLv 71 decade ago
The courts have long held that while persons are secure from illegal (improper or intrusive) searches, they have also held that boarder agents and those entrusted with protecting border/entry/exit points have enhanced authority to conduct searches without a warrant. In many cases they have more powers and authority then police officers when they are acting within the scope of their duties.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It certaiinly appears to be a violation of the 4th Amendment to me.
I expect that there will be a number of lawsuits over this issue.
- Menard KLv 71 decade ago
The thing that would unravel the whole fiasco,
that is to EXPOSE the MYTH of the 19 suicidal hijackers
It didn't happen that way! GET A CLUE AMERICA
WE THE PEOPLE have been LIED to!
we are being played .... WAKE UP AMERICA!
- ?Lv 41 decade ago
The 4th amendment means nothing in this fascist shithole called the United States America. Bush repealed the Bill of Rights and Obama did nothing to restore them.