Spiritually Speaking? Evolution:?

Nice try...

You seem more concern about physical evolution than spiritual

Darwin theory of evolution: there are mutations that make idividuals different from one another, and if that differences make them fit the envorment more than the rest, they will continue to survive and their offsprings will succeed their favorable features.

Likewise, suppose there were a bunch of newborn apes who got different mutations: 1/ones growing more flexible hands, 2/ones making big noises allday, 3/ones alergic with fruits, 4/ones who run faster and 5/one who got bigger brains... One can guess that only 1,4,5 make it to adulthood and bred together into some more superior apes that get many or all these advantages. Just like that, after each peroid of time, the population got a little better, through many (I mean a whole big lot) generations, the first babies, the first individuals of Homo sapiens, was born, got all the features we have today, but their parents were still damn-close-to-human apes.

So, babies first, and they were taken care of by their parents, though not humans but are still good papas and mamas and the proof is that we're here.

First,my definitions: by "adult" I mean an example of a species which is fully mature and capable of all the functions a unit of said species will ever be capable of.

A "child" is an example of a species which is not yet mature. It will eventually gain capabilities that it currently lacks.

Now, I could stop here and say that because primitive cells are fully mature at their creation, they represent a case of adults creating more adults and skipping the step of children entirely (thus, adults came before children), but that wouldn't be interesting, so I'll continue.

Currently, adults/children exist as part of the same cycle of which there is no beginning or end. However, at a certain (very distant) point in history, the pinnacle of evolution involved the splitting of one cell in to two (no adults or children). Therefor, logically speaking, at some point, there must have been a creature that appeared who could produce "children" yet was not itself a "child".

The creature in question was most likely some kind of extremely simple cellular organism that created smaller copies of itself that were functionally identical, yet could increase in size. At this primitive state, the concept of "child" might be applied.

This hypothetical organism represents the link between simple cellular fission and more advanced reproduction, therefor it was created through fission but creates organisms through another mean. It began life as an adult, yet the next generation it produced consisted of "children" which began the grand cycle we see today.

Fully mature organisms were the first to appear by many millions of years, but there was no difference between "adults" and "children". Our concept of "children" only appeared after the necessary evolutionary leaps were made, at which point there were also clearly identifiable "adults".

Do you know how cells reproduce?

Do you know how fishes reproduce?

If yes, then why ask stupid questions. If no, then why not learn something first.

The answer is, adults and children existed for a long time without any actual adult-children relationships. Basically, primitive species just made some offspring and ran. Social units like families, herds and packs evolved way later.

"Which evolved first? An adult human, or a baby human" is patented nonsense, precisely for the reason Happy Penguin told you.

The first living organisms were simple enough not to have a distinct childhood.

The first human baby was born to parents which were not quite human, but was nonetheless similar enough for the parenting techniques they had learned still to be relevant.

What are you talking about?

Based on your question, you have no idea of evolution.

That's the kindest statement I can make about you.

I suggest you delete this question and don't mention it to anyone ever again.

I am so embarrassed for you.

Sense isn't your forte is it.

Your a Jehovah's Witnesses, well that explains so much.

Science is fabricated. That's rich coming from someone who believes in a book that has a talking snake.

If everyone thinks that you are asking a stupid question, maybe you have asked a stupid question. If you can't see that it is a stupid question, maybe you are just plain stupid.

Might I point out that an Adult Human and a Baby Human are both the same species....

And you wonder why Christians get called stupid.

<edit>It is OBVIOUS from your question that you have NO IDEA how evolution works.I'd explain it to but it's too long and I'm too lazy to type all that.So go back to school and LEARN!