Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Atheists:could you imagine that?

Imagine a computer program that generates documents that consists of 1 to of 50-thousend words, in all combinations of your language. one of those documents is a "Donald Fauntleroy Duck" adventure. Another document would be this question and another one your answer, another one a part of the bible another one a part of the quran.

Could it be that one of those documents contains words that explain to you in such a way that you believe it the ultimate truth about "the origin of life", while another document explains in such a way that you believe it also the origin of life but completely opposite as the other document ?

Please answer with more words than yes or no. thank you.

Update:

you can choose those documents that are intrinsicly verifiable, you can choose the ones that are according to you completely self explaining as if it were a math textbook.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    If the two explanations were indeed 'completely opposite', I find it difficult to imagine that both would appear convincing. Too many things would have to be reversed.

    However, if you allow the two explanations to be fairly similar, yet not precisely the same, then I would say it probably is possible. But you would still have to limit me to reading only one or the other of them. If I read both, and recognized the differences, I would of course have to come to a conclusion as to which one (if either) was accurate, and tentatively reject the other.

  • Judy B
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Wrong section, you should ask this in the cosmology or biology section of Science.

    No need for imagination or a computer. Such documents, written by real, live people actually exist.

    There are currently a handful of plausible scientific hypothesis about the origins of life which have not, through scientific experiment, shown to be impossible. So, if you define "belief" to mean "accept as possible and not yet proven wrong" then quite a number of people would believe opposing hypothesis about the origins of life.

    That's the great thing about science based belief. You can believe that several scenarios are possible without committing to any one and you can change your beliefs as more evidence comes forward.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    only if what i read was verifiable.

    though i dont see how i'd verify "Donald Fauntleroy Duck" as realistic, and everyone already knows what utter crap the bible and quran are, so no.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.