Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
I'm looking to buy a new rifle soon.... M1A vs. FAL?
I'm looking to buy a new rifle soon, I 've had a few AR 15s but am thinking I want a .308 either a M1A or a FAL not sure about which is a better?
Funny No hunting
5 Answers
- xscout9094Lv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Go with the M1A. The FAL is a great rifle, but anything that you find will be an inferior copy or one pieced together from surplus parts. Their quality will be hit or miss. If you can find an original FAL it'll cost a lot more than the M1A, but it may be worth it if it's in really good shape.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
This is going to depend on how much you want to spend.
If the sky's the limit,and you can find one, a national Match forged reciever M14/M1a will be the best you can get, but good luck.
If you're looking in the sub-$1700 range, you have two basic choices: a DSA SA58/ FAL, or a Springfield Armory M1A. Its important to note that the Springfields are investment cast recievers, and the DSA are forged. In this light, I give the FAL an edge (and so much so that it made my purchase decision), but I advise you to try both, as both are excellent rifles.
In the sub-$1000 range it becomes even more questionable: You can get good Imbel or StG58 FALs for this price, but remember that these are at this point parts kit guns, and you should be very careful about selecting them. The M1A/M14 choice at this range are Norinco/Polytech Chinese clones, and again are cast receivers.
Both systems work, but you might also consider an HK91 clone (PTR-91, CETME). For a longtime, they were kind of a stepchild of battle rifles here in the US as there was no product support for them, but that's recently improved greatly. I may be considering one for my next "major" firearm.
There is no such thing as a stamped steel FAL reciever.
Source(s): http://www.dsa.com/ (THE place to go for new FALs and good Imbel parts guns) http://www.smithenterprise.com/ ( The way to re-heat treat your cast reciever M1A to forged strength and specs) http://www.fredsm14stocks.com/ (Who's opinion on M14s differs slightly from mine, but you should see what he has to say and make your own decision) Molon Labe! - ?Lv 61 decade ago
The M1A uses a machined receiver. The FAL uses stamped sheet metal.
The open sights on the M1A are a lot more accurate and easy to adjust than the sights on an FAL.
FAL rifles are fine guns, but they are what they are. When you look at how much time and money goes into manufacturing either rifle - you will see that the M1A takes more time and more money to produce. The results are evident in terms of accuracy in the field.
- xqqz_meLv 61 decade ago
Neither. The new AR style. 308's are the way to go. The are much easier to put a scope on, and often have a rail system for grips, bipods, lasers, lights, etc.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- lana_sandsLv 71 decade ago
Consider the Kel tec RFB http://www.keltecweapons.com/our-guns/rifles/rfb/