Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Military widows must remarry?
"Tens of thousands of the nation's war widows find it perplexing and downright disrespectful to their late military husbands: In order to fully collect on insurance their husbands bought for them when alive, they must marry another man.
And to qualify, the widows must remarry when they are 57 or older. Those who remarry earlier miss out, as do widows who never remarry."
Does this seem incredibly messed up to anyone else? When in the military, we were forced to have insurance (for good reason) and forced to keep at at least $100,000 while on deployment (which meant we had to pay the premium each month). Our family is suppose to receive that insurance money should we die during service time. So now, in order for widows to receive that insurance money after their husbands' death, they have to REMARRY? Does this seem incredibly archaic to anyone? Almost like something of a dowery?
"I've never even wanted to date, much less remarry," said Nichole Haycock, a mother of three teenagers in Lawton, Okla., whose 38-year-old military husband died in 2002. "I already married the love of my life. Why would you bring that as a factor?"
Why, in all that is unholy, is the government requiring women to marry to receive insurance money that their husbands already paid for. And in this day in age, where women have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, does this provision also stand for widowers?
Does anyone else think this is crazy, or is it just me? Tell me what you think
7 Answers
- MuttLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
What's really amazing is that some people want the same people that came up with this to also handle our health care.
Another wonderful case of bureaucracy at it's finest.
- Houd1n1Lv 71 decade ago
The inequity is not that a widow has to remarry to receive insurance. The inequity is that if a widow receives a monthly insurance dividend and also collects Survivor Benefit Plan payments, federal law states that the amount of SBP has to be subtracted from the insurance dividend to ensure that they are not "overpaid". VA disability pay and retirement pay run into the same issue unless the retiree qualifies for concurrent receipt (collects both payments with no penalties).
The "widow" loophole seems to be a half-assed attempt by Congress to try and fix the problem, but it didn't work out the way they intended. It also sounds like the law is being fixed, but costs too much.
Not crazy, just a poorly written law that Congress doesn't seem to be worried about.
- Anonymous5 years ago
If that is a state allowance than the government is entitled to do what it needs if the couple knew what they have been getting. in the event that they did not like it they certainly might have taken out inner maximum coverage. Now that stated this does seem very extraordinary to me. while you're scuffling with on your u . s . then certainly one much less hassle is that if something occurs to you, your spouse and youngsters might discover the money for for a first rate existence. i'm uncertain i could decide for yet another guy getting into my homestead for what could be a defined and defined by employing you as a dowry! Very extraordinary. i don't understand why that is one in all those great deal to get married! right here in Britain that is in all threat to pass any opposite direction as in if a females gets remarried then she will have the skill to lose a number of her income with the logic being that the guy might have his very own income and to that end the enjoyed ones income could enhance, to that end no want for each and all the income. i think of the two structures are incorrect and no remember how the females makes a decision to stay her existence after her husband is KIA she might desire to settle for the completed volume and that's that. that is not as much as government to interfere into human beings's own lives like that. I believe you..
- CLv 71 decade ago
The way things are going, don’t be surprised if living retired Veterans lose their pension next due to a typo.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- RayLv 71 decade ago
Honestly, your question was really long and the article was really long, I have the attention span of a seven year old and I barely skimmed each but, on the surface, it does seem messed up.