Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would Noah's ark be found above or below the K-T boundary?
if above the boundary, why keep asking how the dinosaurs could have fit in it?
if below the boundary, why the ridicule at the idea man walked with dinosaurs?
it can't be both ways. the ark would have to be positioned in one location. yet the community of atheists and self appointed experts seem to be divided on this according to the prevalence of both arguments. part of the community is using flawed logic.
if it never existed wouldn't it be better to use sound logic in making that point? on the supposition that it could be a true story about half of those who argue are wrong and both halves say the same thing. on the supposition that the event can not be true the same exists. one side sets forth flawed logic.
SpartanCanuck: you make my point. while i disagree with the conclusion i appreciate the logic you use. many say americans need a better educational system and the Christians here are uneducated because they disagree with the majority of people who believe evolution to be valid. but that majority is comprised of many who follow blindly in their reasoning. (where have i heard that before?) their logic is flawed and care little to even consider truth past their own comfort level. it is enough for many to be part of the majority.
6 Answers
- SpartanCanuckLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
Like any anthropogenic artifact, if it existed, it would be found above the K-T boundary unless artificially planted below it. Since there is no geological/geomorphological evidence for a Biblical global flood, and the notion defies any reasonable understanding of hydrology, it's basically moot. This also goes hand in hand with ridiculing the notion that man walked with dinosaurs, or has existed for anything longer than a blip on the full extent of the life of this planet.
Personally, I figure that flood myths have their origin in the last Ice Age. A lowered sea level meant access to vast areas of land which are presently underwater, including land bridges between Alaska and Sibera (Beringia), and one between the British Isles and mainland Europe. The latter was extensively travelled, and even settled, according to archeological evidence. Certainly, there would have been extensive utilization of then-exposed coastal lowlands as well. With the termination of the last glacial stage, the oceanic re-advance was fairly quick.
- Boris BadenovLv 51 decade ago
Gopher wood was very high in iridium. Maybe the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary is actually the remnants of the Ark.
(Practicing for when I pretend to become a born-again Evangelical and take Kent Hovind's place to reap tons of money off of Creationists who will buy my books and videos)
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It's really, really difficult finding arks that never existed. The Noah story is a silly myth.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Definitely above.
You see, the K2 boundary was laid down by iridium deposits from inside the earth after the water shot out of the crust ..
Because the earth is full of water. You can't prove that it isn't, so therefore it is.
And Noah's ark was floating on the water, and was deposited last.
Source(s): Youtube - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
it NEVER existed
