Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
One nation, under God?
remove it or not? And why?
15 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
It violates the constitution. Simple as that. It says that the government must no be part of any specific religion, however it may allow any under it but to make it just one insults our founders who were not christians and who intended this to be a free land.
- NateLv 71 decade ago
I'd go back to the original pledge that was exactly the same except the under god part that was added during McCarthyism, yes
- Anonymous1 decade ago
This is how I say the pledge:
I pledge allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America
and to the republic for which it stands
one nation, under HYPNOTOAD
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
And then I clap three times.
- ?Lv 41 decade ago
God refers to all gods. Back then it was a common practice to say "God" instead of the exact name of a certain religion's god. Since most people were religious back then that would've been the most common saying. But, you shouldn't just change the Pledge of Allegiance that was made by the founding fathers because it offends a certain group of people.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Winter GloryLv 71 decade ago
Restore the pledge of allegiance to it's original state:
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
-as written in 1892-
"Under God" was added in 1954
- ?Lv 71 decade ago
Remove it. Not only does it violate the Constitution, but it also was not originally in the pledge; it wasn't added until 1954.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
The original (written by a progressive socialist minster, *gasp*) in the late 1800s didn't include it. Therefore, it's a violation of copyright.
Also, it throws off the whole meter.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Might as well remove it since it violates the First Amendment.
- cadisneygirlLv 71 decade ago
We have way more important issues in our country to focus on and spend time and money on.
- neil sLv 71 decade ago
I find it ironic that they put those two words between "nation" and "indivisible," as if to say "here, lets divide it."
No reference to a deity should be made in anything government sponsored.