Are gods Schrodinger's cats?

The difference is that there actually IS a cat to make a verifiable observation of. The cat EXISTS in the first place. A thing cannot both simultaneously exist and not exist.

Ironic twist - Schrodinger;'s actual cat was named Jehovah.

Just wait a month. The cat will definitely be dead by then. Th problem with extending Schrodinger's Cat to god is that Schrodinger's Cat already assumes the cat once existed. The hypothetical is not: here is an empty box you know nothing about, is there anything inside of it. If it was, then I'd say, given I have no evidence that anything actually is inside the box, I think I'm justified in assuming nothing. In other words, "in the terms of physics, he both exists and doesn't exist" strikes me as circular. Surly physics doesn't treat every human conjecture like that.

Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment designed to show how ludicrous the concept of some of the strange behaviour of sub atomic particles that are predicted by the EPR paper, such as quantum entanglement.

The EPR paper predicts that sub atomic particles can exist in two or more quantum states at the same time and those multiple states collapse into one state when measured. I don't think any of those states include non existence though.

To apply the same reasoning Schrödinger did to the EPR paper, I'm going to carry out a thought experiment based on your argument that while God is unobserved He both exists and doesn't exist at the same time.

If God exists then He is the primary cause that caused all things in existence to come into existence or else he isn't God. Since God by your reasoning exists in a state of existing and not existing at the same time until He is observed, then the whole of creation exists in a state of existing and not existing at the same time until observed, at which point the whole cosmos must collapse into a state of existing or not existing. Well I have observed part of creation and therefore I know that all of creation exists and in so knowing the whole of creation has collapsed from a state of quantum uncertainty to a state of existing and since through creation God has been indirectly observed He too must collapse from a state of quantum uncertainty to a state of existence.

So if you accept that God can exist then logic dictates that He must exist since we cannot deny that the cosmos exists. If God doesn't exist he can't possibly exist. I think this thought experiment disproves the hypothesis that God could be in a quantum state of existing and not existing at the same time.

Well, quantum uncertainty only applies on the scale of the very small. For example, our uncertainty about the position of an elephant with a mass of several tonnes travelling at a few miles per hour is very very small indeed, however for an electron, we can't be certain of it's velocity to any better than within about a thousand miles an hour.

This is because σx.σp ≤ ħ/2

where ħ = h/2π, and σx, σp are the standard deviations of position and momentum.

Now god is supposed to be really, really, REALLY big, so we could probably nail down his velocity with some reasonable degree of precision.

We know that the cat was alive when we put it in the box. So there is a chance that the cat is alive. We have NEVER had any sort of evidence that god is real

No, because the correspondence principle forces a quantum system to behave like a Newtonian system as the quantum number becomes large, and gods are much too large to be quantum systems.

If we wait long enough, is God also dead regardless?

Yeah sounds right.

yes