Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

DLM
Lv 7
DLM asked in SportsHockey · 10 years ago

If you were in charge with realignment, what teams would you put in each division?

Take into account whatever you feel is necessary...

Travel, time zones, historical significance, nostalgia, rivalries, etc.

(And yes, include Winnipeg)

Update:

I'm loving a lot of these answers. Being a Minnesota Wild fan, I am sort of conflicted on whether they should be in a division with Vancouver. The rivalry (for Wild fans) is the only real one this team has (although it hasn't really been significant since 2003). But a lot of children don't get to see the games played in Vancouver, as they don't start until after 9:00 Central Time.

I loved the old days, when the North Stars were in a division with Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis... and to me, Winnipeg and Minnesota should be grouped together.

I will put this question to a vote to see how the rest of the people in this category feel about the answers already submitted.

Thanks everyone for your responses.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    Orr Division

    Toronto

    Montreal

    Detroit

    Boston

    Rangers

    Ottawa

    Clarke Division

    Chicago

    Dallas

    Los Angeles

    Pittsburgh

    St, Louis

    Philadelphia

    Bossy Division

    Buffalo

    Vancouver

    Islanders

    Calgary

    Washington

    New Jersey

    Gretzky Division

    Phoenix

    Edmonton

    Colorado

    Carolina

    San Jose

    Anaheim

    Thomson Division

    Winnipeg

    Columbus

    Florida

    Tampa Bay

    Minnesota

    Nashville

    I've chosen to base my divisions based on when teams entered the League.

    The names of the divisions were chosen based on a great name associated with one of those teams not already immortalized by the NHL. So, the original division is named after Orr because Richard has a trophy named after him. The 1967 division is named after Bobby Clarke because in a fight between Clarke and Lemieux......Clarke is the one who walks to the penalty box under his own steam. The 70s expansion teams in the Bossy Division, best goal scorer in NHL history, and the best career pts/game by a guy not named Gretzky/Lemieux. Then Gretzky division encompasses the WHA teams and first two teams from the 90s. Finally the Thomson Division is named after David Thomson who could be making people in Winnipeg happy this coming year.

    Every team would play one another 3x for an 87 game balanced schedule, and the top 16 teams make the playoffs. The teams would then play a 15 game round robin for the firsat playoff round, and the top 2 teams that emerge from that would play a 7 game series for the Stanley Cup.

    This would generate a lot of revenue because all playoff teams are guaranteed at least 7 home games.

    Source(s): LITY
  • 10 years ago

    Since I'm in charge, I'll take a simple East/West approach:

    EAST

    Boston Bruins

    Buffalo Sabres

    Carolina Hurricanes

    Florida Panthers

    Montreal Canadiens

    Nashville Predators

    New Jersey Devils

    New York Islanders

    New York Rangers

    Ottawa Senators

    Philadelphia Flyers

    Pittsburgh Penguins

    Tampa Bay Lightning

    Toronto Maple Leafs

    Washington Capitals

    WEST

    Anaheim Ducks

    Calgary Flames

    Chicago Blackhawks

    Colorado Avalanche

    Columbus Blue Jackets

    Dallas Stars

    Detroit Red Wings

    Edmonton Oilers

    Los Angeles Kings

    Manitoba Blizzard

    Minnesota Wild

    Phoenix Coyotes

    San Jose Sharks

    St. Louis Blues

    Vancouver Canucks

    Divisions only mean a longer playoff tourney, and I think one round is plenty. Now, I realize why the current playoff tourneys are so long, but again, I like it simple.

  • mega
    Lv 6
    10 years ago

    I generally follow Pat H's idea, although as an alternative I would suggest putting Vancouver in the Pacific and leaving Colorado in the Northwest. This would avoid having the Canucks and Wild play each other six times a year while being two time zones apart.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    EASTERN CONFERENCE

    NORTHEAST

    Montreal

    Toronto

    Boston

    Ottawa

    Buffalo

    ATLANTIC

    New York

    New York

    Philadelphia

    Pittsburgh

    New Jersey

    SOUTHEAST

    Washington

    Carolina

    Florida

    Tampa Bay

    Nashville***(from Central)

    WESTERN CONFERENCE

    CENTRAL

    Chicago

    Detroit

    St. Louis

    Columbus

    Minnesota***(from Northwest)

    NORTHWEST

    Vancouver

    Edmonton

    Calgary

    Colorado

    Winnipeg***(from southeast as Atlanta)

    PACIFIC

    San Jose

    Los Angeles

    Anaheim

    Pheonix

    Dallas

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Northeast:

    Boston

    Montreal

    Toronto

    Buffalo

    Ottawa

    Atlantic:

    Philadelphia

    New Jersey

    New York Rangers

    New York Islanders

    Pittsburgh

    Southeast:

    Washington

    Nashville (New)

    Florida

    Tampa Bay

    Carolina

    Central:

    Detroit

    Chicago

    Columbus

    St. Louis

    Dallas (New)

    Northwest:

    Minnesota

    Vancouver

    Winnipeg (New)

    Calgary

    Edmonton

    Pacific:

    San Jose

    Los Angeles

    Anaheim

    Phoenix

    Colorado (New)

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    universal popular team- crimson Sox 2nd popular from the NL- Giants AL West- Mariners AL appropriate- Tigers AL East- crimson Sox (universal popular) NL West- Giants NL appropriate- Reds NL East- Marlins

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.