Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Okay we have new proof about the theory of evolution...?
http://news.yahoo.com/lost-world-atlantis-landscap...
So we now have geological records of cities going back about 52 million years. WHich is long before evolution says we descended from the monkeys..... are they making a monkey out of them with this new finding or what. How do they explain this gem.
Okay... so the lost city of atlantis, which they have found traces of, and is mentioned in the article for comparison, actually isn't a city ? before exploding with all the ranchor, try actually reading the article.
4 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavorite Answer
the article just threw a misleading title to gain more readers. One of the scientist believe that the landscape resemble a country. It actually does check this out http://www.livescience.com/14974-geologists-remain...
They used sound waves to detect the rocky formations. Evolution is a theory. I think it's true. Though I don't think it actually happened like the scientists think. There are too many missing links which we'll maybe never find. Atlantis may have existed and just like many other civilisations unknown to us.
- CirbrynLv 710 years ago
> So we now have geological records of cities going back about 52 million years.
Your linked article refers to a 56 million year old "landscape". Not a city.
- Vincent GLv 710 years ago
And where, pray tell, does it says there was a city there?
How do you explain that you see things that are not in the story and allows you to go with such a ludicrous claim?
