Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Fellow atheists - if a God existed...?
No, this is not Pascal. :P
I don't believe that a God exists, because there is no evidence. However, just as a fun mental exercise, IF a God exists, what do you think we could deduce about him/her/it?
For example, if God is omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, then he would have known about the Norway shootings, would have seen them happening, would have had the power to stop them, and would have had the motivation to stop them. Yet they occurred. Wouldn't this mean that if a God exists, one or more of those qualities must be false?
If a God exists, I think the best explanation is that he/she/it is to us what we are to ants. Infinitely more powerful, infinitely more knowledgeable, but still a far cry from omnipotent and omniscient. And given the wacky design of the human body, the universe which is 99.99999% uninhabitable, the vast number of species that have gone extinct over time, and the general randomness and chaos of life, I'd have to assume that he/she/it is a being who does not have a full awareness or understanding of what they're capable of.
Someone posted a question here a while ago asking if God was a careless little kid with a chemistry set. Joking aside, IF a God exists, I think that really would be the best explanation for what we see around us.
Sorry about that, Mad Eye. :P
EDIT: "Your pay-off line blows your argument out of the water. "What we see around us" are the effects of human activity. "
I don't just mean human activity. I mean what we observe on the Earth, in the solar system, in the galaxy, in the universe, in all of existence. Existence as we know it makes no sense if we are being governed by a perfect being.
25 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavorite Answer
Hello Brethren, as a Pastafarian, do not get angry!
Compare our religion to those that are built on lies. I am not talking necessarily about mainstream religions (which themselves are often full of mysticism and ad-hoc reasoning), but think of cults, or churches where the leaders are scamming their followers out of money. These are groups where the followers fully believe. Are these churches legitimate since they have many True Believers?
Or can we agree that religion is as much about community as any shared faith. By any rational metric, Pastafarians are as legimate a religious group as any. Arguably more so, since we’re honest and rational.
Ramen
- HarknessLv 710 years ago
Maybe your perception of omnibenevolence is off. Maybe it it more benevolent for god to take those victims into heaven, or directly into reincarnation, or whatever. Really, how do you know that to a god that living to 80+ in good health is benevolence?
If a god exists, I wouldn't necessarily assume god created the universe or life. Couldn't a god be "Infinitely more powerful, infinitely more knowledgeable" and just have come across the universe already in existence and watched as life arose from non-life on Earth (or found it like that) and then decided to have fun with the primitive human race? (I'm totally channeling what I remember about the Q from Star Trek: Next Generation, but you get my drift: just because a god exists doesn't mean god created anything.) I guess for me, if god was proven to exist, I'd still like to see all the different qualities of god proven too. So even if a god exists, who knows?
- ?Lv 710 years ago
I think the last paragraph there is the most noble and realistic (cold those actually correlate???) and if it`s so, metaphorically, in general it might be an improvement for all the self-pity and disillusionment and murderous revenges and conversions, as I`m sure I`d be most inept with a chemistry-set and no tuition,too.
And IF IF IF, repeat, IF there`s a being with the chemistry set, perhaps the Existence is the Sorcerer, an goddi `s the apprentice.
Personally I like the metaphor of a genius painter, with no form to copy..............as metaphors go, it makes more sense to me. Imagine, powder paints and a sphere.......hurricanes, the whole works. Will send my invoice to Disney later (fat chance)citing you as the inspiration.I just wish the apprentice would... and.... and.... and what can you expect of an untutored genius... WE KNOW.so its back to taking responsib-i-l-i-t-eeeeeeeeeeee. Pi sq x a paintbox. Here, have a paintbrush..
Source(s): 2 much caffeine be4 lunch - skepsisLv 710 years ago
I would have a problem with the "omnibenevolent" trait. A deity that is omniscient and omnipotent would be self-sufficient. Therefore such a being would have no interest in anything, including the creation of a material universe. Even if this being did create, for reasons unknown, why would it have any interest in the fortunes of any developing lifeforms? (As an illustration, our own "God" has not seen fit to intervene in any bloody outrage, human or natural, throughout history, outside of the Bible.)
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- t oLv 610 years ago
well the simple answer as written in the bible itself though many don't like to see it is that God is not very loving he strives on fear and anger when people don't listen he wipes them out with floods and plagues so worship him or else. and on that note he created the angels to do his will they do not have free will and must obey him so if they must obey him then lucifer must have been told to wage war and by falling and becoming satan he is and always has been doing Gods will so it is therefor Gods will. so by the bible itself God might have actually been happy to see the norwegian death toll rise. the God of the bible is not a nice person by any means he is an egotistical maniacal god. Jesus was the nice one teaching forgiveness and such but really if jesus was alive today he would be a Buddhist lol. because Christians are so far from the teachings of christianity that he would not even recognize them as his followers.
So if God exists then he would be a very evil being based on things he has done. not careless but actually EVIL so he would not care at all if we kill each other in his name and would do nothing to stop it.
but of course that's assuming god exists which is just silly to begin with the stories of fear and hate were created by men in order to attain followers through fear and gain political power as a result using it to shift followers views on when wars were god's will or not. so the rulers had to be on good terms with the clergy or the people wouldn't fight for them .
- Anonymous10 years ago
Many of the atheists and theists here cannot deal with hypothetical questions. But it seems to me that if there is a God, it must obey the laws of logic and it cannot be made of matter, energy or exist in space or time. That's all I can imagine deducing.
- marsel_duchampLv 710 years ago
What I would deduce would be two possibilities or a mixture of those two.
He doesn't give a crap about humans
And/or
He likes seeing us suffer and get perverse pleasure from people appealing to him and worshipping him.
Ever hear "God's Song" by Randy Newman? It kind of combines those two possibilities
"Cain slew Abel Seth knew not why
For if the children of Israel were to multiply
Why must any of the children die?
So he asked the Lord
And the Lord said:
"Man means nothing he means less to me
than the lowiliest cactus flower
or the humblest yucca tree
he chases round this desert
cause he thinks that's where i'll be
that's why i love mankind
I recoil in horror from the foulness of thee
from the squalor and the filth and the misery
How we laugh up here in heaven at the prayers you offer me
That's why i love mankind"
The Christians and the Jews were having a jamboree
The Buddhists and the Hindus joined on satellite TV
They picked their four greatest priests
And they began to speak
They said "Lord the plague is on the world
Lord no man is free
The temples that we built to you
Have tumbled into the sea
Lord, if you won't take care of us
Won't you please please let us be?"
And the Lord said
And the Lord said
"I burn down your cities--how blind you must be
I take from you your children and you say how blessed are we
You must all be crazy to put your faith in me
That's why i love mankind
You really need me
That's why i love mankind"
- Anonymous10 years ago
Entirely plausible, metaphysically speaking.
However, I disagree that 99.999...% of the universe is uninhabitable. In fact, it better not be, because eventually we need a new home.
Since space-time is so vast, and apparently only part of a "larger multiverse", anything is possible. Maybe even if we can or can't travel the distance ourselves, we decide to seed life elsewhere in the vastness. We try to program it to survive, grow, change, build, and eventually, through chaos theory mathematics and the laws of entropy - a pre-programmed "consciousness" takes precedence in one life form, and it becomes dominant within it's reach.
...? Yeah, I went there.
- ?Lv 610 years ago
If a god exists it is an impotent little fool. it is unable to do the slightest godly thing and won't even show itself for fear of being ridiculed
as for the shootings in Norway, I hate to say it, but it is long overdue for that exact reaction due to the constant eroding of human rights in favour of muslim, sharia laws and immigrant appeasement
- Anonymous10 years ago
EDIT: "Your pay-off line blows your argument out of the water. "What we see around us" are the effects of human activity. "
YOUR REPLY: I don't just mean human activity. I mean what we observe on the Earth, in the solar system, in the galaxy, in the universe, in all of existence. Existence as we know it makes no sense if we are being governed by a perfect being.
OK Angry Noo I think see what you're getting at. In that case, can I recommend you go to the BBC iPlayer and watch tonight's programme (9pm July 27) on BBC 2 called "The Code" ... unless you've already watched it 'live' of course. I think you'll find that the programme's content demonstrates the underlying order in everything terrestrial and cosmic. Quite the opposite from the juvenile assertion of "the kid with the chemistry set" in fact, and pointing instead to a creative perfectionist. As it says in Max Ehrmann's wonderful 1927 text "Desiderata" ... "be at peace with God, whatever you conceive God to be"