Have orgasms always existed as we know them today?

There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms..I think this will go down do in the annals of the history of this sight as the question of the decade.I never had any idear that this subject could cause such a migration i don't think any one is any where else an orgasam for mem woosh!!! and it's over what? with women it can last a lot longer some women can in one incounterr have multipal orgasms as far as being evolutionary how in the world can any one ever hope to be able valadate thetr answer all it is is going over there for tintalation which is ok if your into that every knows there's no way to prove it they just want to talk about it which is great ! but i never would it would create such an exodus unbelivable im stilll aughing im going check this later its pushing towards the1,000 mk.

This is a poor estimation of early man. Although primitive, man's cognitive ability certainly existed. To generalize early man as brute savages is contradicts our ability to act rationally and reason. There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms..I think this will go down do in the annals of the history of this sight as the question of the decade.I never had any idear that this subject could cause such a migration i don't think any one is any where else an orgasam for mem woosh!!! and it's over what? with women it can last a lot longer some women can in one incounterr have multipal orgasms as far as being evolutionary how in the world can any one ever hope to be able valadate thetr answer all it is is going over there for tintalation which is ok if your into that every knows there's no way to prove it they just want to talk about it which is great ! but i never would it would create such an exodus unbelivable im stilll aughing im going check this later its pushing towards the1,000 mk.

To generalize early man as brute savages is contradicts our ability to act rationally and reason. There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms..I think this will go down do in the annals of the history of this sight as the question of the decade.I never had any idear that this subject could cause such a migration i don't think any one is any where else an orgasam for mem woosh!!! and it's over what? with women it can last a lot longer some women can in one incounterr have multipal orgasms as far as being evolutionary how in the world can any one ever hope to be able valadate thetr answer all it is is going over there for tintalation which is ok if your into that every knows there's no way to prove it they just want to talk about it which is great ! but i never would it would create such an exodus unbelivable im stilll aughing im going check this later its pushing towards the1,000 mk.

Have orgasms always existed as we know them today?

Discovery Channel presents Curiosity. A bold new series that asks the most provocative questions and follows them wherever they lead. Watch the next episode Sunday, August 21st at 8pm. Find more info here: http://curiosity.discovery.com/

Orgasm has always existed. This start from the creation for men. If sex existed so did orgasms.

1

Looking through other answers that downplayed the role of female orgasms, it is clear that a false premise has led to these conclusions. First off, from an evolutionary perspective, if the female orgasm did not serve a purpose, it would not have evolved. Moreover, these arguments are based the premise that early man was a savage brute that did not value family or community. This is a poor estimation of early man. Although primitive, man's cognitive ability certainly existed. To generalize early man as brute savages is contradicts our ability to act rationally and reason. There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms.

First off, from an evolutionary perspective, if the female orgasm did not serve a purpose, it would not have evolved. Moreover, these arguments are based the premise that early man was a savage brute that did not value family or community. This is a poor estimation of early man. Although primitive, man's cognitive ability certainly existed. To generalize early man as brute savages is contradicts our ability to act rationally and reason. There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms.

THIS question has captured I believe the in tire population of this sight I cant get over it was truly worth the -5 points that's for sure I can't stop laughing this question I will definitely definitely tell all my friends to'' come ''(no pun intended) over to see this carnal-- villiage oit's like pulling up to thousands of starving people with rail cars filled with food! more like flies on a garbage dump amasing.I think this will go down do in the annals of the history of this sight as the question of the decade.I never had any idear that this subject could cause such a migration i don't think any one is any where else an orgasam for mem woosh!!! and it's over what? with women it can last a lot longer some women can in one incounterr have multipal orgasms as far as being evolutionary how in the world can any one ever hope to be able valadate thetr answer all it is is going over there for tintalation which is ok if your into that every knows there's no way to prove it they just want to talk about it which is great ! but i never would it would create such an exodus unbelivable im stilll aughing im going check this later its pushing towards the1,000 mk.

if the female orgasm did not serve a purpose, it would not have evolved. Moreover, these arguments are based the premise that early man was a savage brute that did not value family or community. This is a poor estimation of early man. Although primitive, man's cognitive ability certainly existed. To generalize early man as brute savages is contradicts our ability to act rationally and reason. There is a distinct advantage to existing in a family or tribal community where some individuals raise the children while others collect food. This suggests that forming relationships, in some form, was necessary. Consequently, the act of sex did not exist, at least excursively, as a savage act. Finally, given the statement above about cognitive functioning, man desires relationships with other man. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that meaning love making did exist. In this case, both males and females would mutually desire orgasms.

I will definitely definitely tell all my friends to'' come ''(no pun intended) over to see this carnal-- villiage oit's like pulling up to thousands of starving people with rail cars filled with food! more like flies on a garbage dump amasing.I think this will go down do in the annals of the history of this sight as the question of the decade.I never had any idear that this subject could cause such a migration i don't think any one is any where else an orgasam for mem woosh!!! and it's over what? with women it can last a lot longer some women can in one incounterr have multipal orgasms as far as being evolutionary how in the world can any one ever hope to be able valadate thetr answer all it is is going over there for tintalation which is ok if your into that every knows there's no way to prove it they just want to talk about it which is great ! but i never would it would create such an exodus unbelivable im stilll aughing im going check this later its pushing towards the1,000 mk.