Should NATO directly support Libyan Rebels?

Question

I understand the quick answer that most will give is yes, NATO has already been supporting Libyan Rebels.  However, I do not believe it is that simple.  NATO is enforcing UN resolution 1970 and 1973; and Libyan Rebels are not a recognized government.  Therefore, NATO is technically not directly supporting or allied with the Rebels.  If one could elaborate and/or provide links that would reinforce any premise for either side of this question, it would be much appreciated.  Perhaps past wars where NATO and rebel forces were involved may answer my question as well.

This is for a small argument paper that I am writing and I need premises for both sides of the argument.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

They already have, and the quick answer should be NO.

Anonymous · Answer

Many countries are recognizing the rebels as the legitimate government. The rebels will hopefully establish a democracy.

However, many people point to the Muslim Brotherhood as the reason not to directly support the rebels. While they may create a democracy, they may choose the Muslim Brotherhood to lead. We can only hope for the best.

Kchess07 · Answer

They won't surrender the Lockerbie bomber, after this country helped them.  It's enough to make me question their intentions.

Fear of the Dark · Answer

Well they definitelly did it! (but no they should not have done this).

Trending News

Should NATO directly support Libyan Rebels?

4 Answers