Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

oldandtired asked in Social ScienceSociology · 10 years ago

Do you agree or not with the following?

All wealth comes from the earth, combined with the labor of “producers” who turn grass into hamburgers, iron ore into cars, and trees into homes, etc. Survival of the human race is dependent upon these people. To better understand my point, let us envision them as the miners who, with pick and shovel, dig gold out of the ground.

Depending on the producers for their existence, we have the peripherals, as I call them, who provide services that some people want, but mankind would NOT go extinct if they disappeared tomorrow. Let us call them the refiners and coin makers. Remember, coins are handy but they would not exist unless someone dug the gold out of the ground.

Then we have the parasites that produce nothing but the authority to insure that they and the peripherals live far better from the production of gold than those who produced the gold in the first place.

When the parasites and peripherals demand more gold than the producers can dig societies collapse. This is what we see in the world today and read about in history books.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I disagree. Necessity is the mother of all invention. Should the gold miners disappear, the coin makers, who were clever enough to figure out how to make coins, would find a way to dig for gold. Human beings are adaptable. We are capable of changing our lives in order to meet our needs.

  • 10 years ago

    agree

  • Joy
    Lv 4
    10 years ago

    agree

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.