Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
That Knife that had Kercher's blood on the blade and Knox's DNA on the handle?
I think they proved that was not blood on the blade, just some DNA some idiot got on their glove and then it wound up on the blade when they handled it.
While you could tell the skeptics that there is proof that Amanda Stabbed Meredith, you can't use the knife anymore. What else is there that can be used to answer those people who say Amanda is innocent, and you can't believe the stuff we read in the newspaper?
4 Answers
- 10 years agoFavorite Answer
Actually, the independent experts stated that "Meredith's DNA" is actually Rye starch. And as far as the bra clasp goes, they also stated that Stefanoni mistook an X chromosome for a Y chromosome. So, unless Raffaele has a vagina, his DNA isn't on the clasp. The prosecution is done. Amanda and Raffaele will be released later this month, or in early October.
- 10 years ago
The prosecution's explanation is that Kercher's blood was on the blade but Amanda cleaned the knife in bleach, so everything was washed off except the 1 molecule of Kercher's DNA on the blade, Knox's DNA on the handle and some starch in between. Therefore the Knife would have been a key piece of evidence, if Amanda didn't wash it.
- 10 years ago
The Italians must have some other reason why they must keep Amanda in prison.
Kercher was just a dead body from a murder Rudy did in the house Amanda lived in. This was a convienient thing for the Italians who want Amanda locked up to use as a source of fake evidence they used to frame her.
Don't believe me? Then talk to any Italian who thinks that Amanda is guilty. Record the conversation secretly. Every thing this Italian says about why Amanda is guilty can be proved to be false.
When you get to the point where he rufuses to answer anymore questions, then bet him $100 that he can't tell you anything that can't be proven to be a lie.
- 10 years ago
There must be other evidence that proves Amanda's guilt. The judge and jury decided she was guilty, and so did most of the population of Italy and Britain, and they did this even though the motive is hard to believe.
I don't remember anything else, but then I didn't follow the trial.
Source(s): The Daily Mail