I love Ron Paul's Constitutional approach, but when I argue a historical fact, I get insulted- Why?

I agree that Paul has some good stances but the bad ones are too much for me to swallow and vote for him...

Sorry Ron... You paint with too many colors for me...

† FNS †

i like Ron Paul's stand on distinctive subjects. i think of Ron Paul version 2.0 could desire to win the presidency sometime, yet this version could no longer win on the national degree. do you be attentive to that Ron Paul has had banner provides on race based White internet web pages? you may no longer try this and win a countrywide election. If Ron Paul have been given the nomination the media will run this tale on a daily basis till the election, and he will lose.

I don't see any historical facts in there.

That's not why Jefferson had a Koran. The Barbary Pirates were our enemies, but Morocco was the first nation to recognize the US. We had better relations with many of the Muslim states than some of the European powers.

And we didn't find any uranium at all in Iraq. You've been lied to.

Edit: Sorry, but given there have been zero reports of finding any uranium (not the mention the intel they were even trying to get any was bogus), the only conclusion I can come to is that you are lying.

You also don't know a damn thin about Islam. They can't convert by the sword. They converted people by the pocket book. They conquered countries, then taxed them. Muslims had lower taxes.

On the other hand, Christianity did convert by the sword. Look up the northern crusades.

We got no yellowcake out of there.

Islam, like Christianity, like any proselytizing religion believes in spreading their religion around the world. Often at the point of a sword.

Or have the Crusades slipped your historical studies?

The Muslims want to convert everyone to their religions, and the Christians want to convert everyone to their religions, clashes are inevitable.

Paul has more problems than his stance on Islam when it comes to foreign and domestic policies.

If you found it, you'd better be sure you aren't breaching security talking about it, because no one else says it was there. Do read all the way to the bottom, this wasn't new yellowcake that Bush claimed entered the country in a attempt to build a dirty bomb, this was old stuff already known and figured in by the UN.

OK, you aren't fond of the Crusades, so how's the Inqusition for you? Or the Reformation, or the constant problems of the Schism? The problem is religion, yours, mine, theirs.

When you carry the opinion that you are rescuing souls from eternal hell, you don't always do it by love. And even in love you can destroy a culture.

The problem is not God, the problem is man.

The problem is not that they ignore historical fact,its that we are all inclined to ignore religious fact.

This isn't an east/west problem its a religious war to them.

Entirely incorrect, the first nation to recognize the US was Morocco. The founders even made a treaty with the Sultan, declaring America to not be a Christian nation, and to not prevent the building mosques on American soil.

Blowback is real. The US funded the Mujaheddin fighting the Soviets, they later became elements of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The US gave weapons to wage war against Iran, so any weapons of mass destruction they had were American. The US propped up the Shah of Iran, so when he was overthrown, the government which replaced him hated the US, and they did the same thing in Cuba. The US keeps the Saudi monarchy in place, which funds Al-Shabbab, Boko Harem and Al-Qaeda, and keeps an environment in their nation which breeds extremists (such as bin Laden, and most of the 9/11 hijackers). So basically all of America's enemies (with the exception of North Korea) are America's fault.

He is not turning a blind eye. He just doesn't want us in there countries telling them what to do. We should just let them be! If they should interfere with our ships in the gulf, we come back with a swift hand. I've been in the gulf over 20 times, and in many of the countries over there. It is a big waste!

I wish that we could make a bomb the size of the world and cookie cutter the united states and israel out of the bomb, and then blow everybody else up. Then Israel and us would be the only two countries left on the face of the earth. Then everything would be peaceful and we wouldn't have to bomb anybody anymore.

That's sarcasm above btw, for all the morons out there who might misinterpret it as a real opinion.

For me, it's because I'm sick to death of having RP shoved down my throat with the same insults thrown back like I'm not a "true American" because I don't agree with Ron Paul.

Because I had to hide my email address because his bully supporters wouldn't stop emailing me his propaganda.

Enough already

We have been pissing off the middle east since the 70's, we should stay out of their problems. I assure you that if we had never been over there they would have no reason to fly planes into our buildings, they would be focusing on Israel. Therefore we made it our problem.

We need to start a war against Iran. I got in an argument with a liberal about this one time. That liberal tried to tell me that the Iraq war was unnecessary. He claimed that Iraq never actually had any WMD's and had no connections to 9/11. I quickly explained to him how I heard on Fox News that Iraq did have WMD's and they were connected to 9/11.

He also tried to tell me that the US getting attacked on 9/11 might have something to do with the fact that the US has bombed 33 countries since the end of WW2. Wrong. Terrorists are angry at us because they hate our freedoms. They're angry that we have a constitution and a bill of rights and so that's why they attacked us on 9/11. Liberals are so Naive. Peace isn't an option as liberals claim it is.

We need to start a war against Iran to stop them from making WMD's and because, like Iraq, they also had connections to the 9/11 attacks.

If you can watch this video and countermand the points it makes about Iran and blowback you could become convincing.