Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why did I answer "Ron Paul" when asked who is the best Republican?
I want him to win the Republican nomination.
I'm a Democrat. That is a sure win for us.
It's like a no-brainer.
10 Answers
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
You are not very smart Paul defeats Obama hands down
A true dummycrat wants Newt Gingrich that would be a cakewalk for you
- 9 years ago
If Ron Paul wins the Republican nomination he will go down in history as one of the best presidents this country has ever had. There is no way Obama could beat him.
Go Ron Paul!
- ?Lv 79 years ago
Who cares which Republican candidate a Democrat wants to win? Of course they want Ron Paul because they know he's the only one Obama can beat.
- AlLv 69 years ago
Paul is actually not a very good republican, which is the reason I like him. If he were to run as an independent, I'd vote for him.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 9 years ago
^ I really do think we need an 'independent' party. If Ron Paul ran as independent he'd outshine the rest.
- Anonymous9 years ago
sir, I know that with you being on welfare you feel that you pay more than your fair share in taxes. after all you need something to do while you sit on your *** all day
cell phone tax
internet tax
cable tv tax
cigarette tax (we don't expect you to grow your own, waaaaaay too much work)
liquor tax (we don't expect you to brew your own drinks, waaaaaaay too much work)
check this out;
Ron Paul is for the US Constitution and against the neo-conservative / socialist movements that are more commonly referred to as Republican and Democrat parties. Modern elections are all about buying votes with money stolen from the national treasury or campaign contributions given in return for special favors. Think I'm wrong? Why don't you read the US Constitution and an essay about Col Dave Crockett, "Not Yours to Give."?
Both MSM parties (republicans and democrats) are heavily reliant on emotion. (the voters are a jury that has proven to be incapable of making logical decisions)
I look up bills on govtrack.us. I can also see the bill sponsors and voting record of senate and congress.
At least w/ SOPA King B Hussein Obama will not need to sit and wait w/ his internet kill switch. It will be done automatically. In addition please consider this;
FEMA camps and NDAA are the real thing. (just like an Orwellian Utopia) You'll be gettin' the eff out of dodge to avoid some kind of urban uprising because of a disaster or emergency and about 30 or 40 miles out of town traffic will stop. Military stormtroopers will walk through stopped traffic and warn people to stay in their cars. When you get to the roadblock ahead you will be told to get out of your car (leave your keys and belongings in the car and DO NOT bring any weapons.) Then you will wait in a holding area for a bus and go to one of their internment facilities for in-processing. Hopefully you will not get to play any of their games (waterboarding, solitary confinement, etc) But don't worry, 6 fully staffed waterboards means you won't have a long line to wait in.
NDAA (just signed into law by Barack Hussein Obama) will be used to authorize the whole thing, Did you read the book or see the movie "1984"? That's what it is. It allows any federal agency to declare an emergency and use the military forces to impose martial law. What they are doing in the mid east (door to door searches without warrants or any due process whatsoever) is only a rehearsal of what they have in store for us here. This is an article I wrote for another section.
Do the police need a warrant to search me or my property? Under aspects of the US Constitution, all persons are protected from unwarranted searches and any other form of arbitrary harassment. Unfortunately modern courts have misinterpreted the intentions of the founding fathers who authored the US Constitution and Bill of Rights to give the police the power at their discretion to use "probable cause." Police should not be allowed to lawfully act on suspicions or whims, and any action against any person should be deemed unconstitutional. This also includes any electronic surveillance such as wiretaps, directional mics, etc. Of course under aspects of the "Patriot Act" they will claim that it is to protect us from terrorists. They also claim that states need to implement a REAL ID program so that sheeple can be digitally mapped for easy identification to once again... protect us from terrorists. Meanwhile, the southern border is wide open to basically let in whoever wants to come for whatever reason.
The fact is this; the enforcement of drug and firearm prohibition has allowed the government to turn this country into a pig powered police state and everyday it is becoming more and more like the USSR. You might like all of this "protection" but personally I prefer to protect myself. If you are the kind of person that wants to give up your liberty for security then please go somewhere else like China or N Korea.
Source(s):
HR 504 (died in session but it will return) HR 1540 (NDAA 2012) signed into law 12-31-2011 by King B. Hussein Obama
- Anonymous9 years ago
You are not a Dem, you are a Pauli and not too well informed.
- Anonymous9 years ago
Yep.
- 9 years ago
-Because You're a "Dreamer..." And THAT's really ALL, "No-brainers" -know how to Do... ;)
Source(s): A Realist. :)