American Christians, which of the following makes me a heretic in your eyes?

A "heretic"?

What year is this ... 1612?

As an American Catholic, I don't find any of those four to be "heretical."

Yes, I understand your point ... that many American fundamentalists seem to act as if

(a) they represent all Christians; and

(b) it really is 1612, and everyone from Darwin to Dawkins should be be forced to "recant" (as many seem to do to Darwin posthumously), if not given a taste of the fate of Giordano Bruno.

But trust me, they do not represent all American Christians. Not by a long shot.

If you have an issue with fundamentalists or creationists, please say 'fundamentalists' or 'creationists' ... the word "Christian" is not synonymous with either of those words (despite what fundamentalists and creationists tell you).

Charles Darwin failed miserably in his quest to validate his argument on Evolution.

God created the Heaven and Earth as the Holy Bible declares (Genesis 1:1). Don't put faith in theories. Have faith in God.

Charles Darwin did not use good logic in his famous book, "The Origin of Species."

W.R. Thompson, a Canadian entomologist(entomology-study of insects) of international repute, wrote in his introduction to the centennial edition of Darwin's Origen, "Darwin did not show in the Origin that species had originated by natural selection; he merely showed, on the basis of certain facts and assumptions, how this might have happened, and as he had convinced himself he was able to convince others.

Chapter 4 of the Origin, entitled "Natural Selection; or the Survival of the Fittest," occupies 44 pages in the 1958 mentor edition. In this chapter Darwin used the language of speculation, imagination, and assumption at least 187 times. For example, pages 118 and 119 contain the following phrases; "may have been," "is supposed to," perhaps," "If we suppose," "may still be," 'it is probable," "will generally tend," "may" "will generally tend," 'If," 'if...assumed," "supposed," "supposed," "probably," "It seems, therefore, extremely probable," and "We may suppose." Is this really the language of science? No, it is not.

Of Darwin's speculative arguments Thompson wrote, "....Personal convictions, simple possibilities, are presented as if they were proofs, or at least valid arguments in favor of the theory....The demonstration can be modified without difficulty to fit any conceivable case. It is without scientific value, since it cannot be verified; but since the imagination has free rein, it is easy to convey the impression that a concrete example of real transmutation (change of one species to another) has been given."

Source: Thompson, W.R., Introduction to The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, E.P. Dutton and Co., New York.

Have faith dear friends in God, not theories.

Genesis 1:1

Isaiah 45:18

Colossians 1:16

Hebrews 11:1-6

Genesis 2:1-3

Exodus 20:8-11

Psalm 14:1

SDA

As a fair weather atheist I'll have to go with using the word/term inneracy, you trying to make us turn Christian or what?

None of these are heresy... Asking questions, studying religion, and evolution is not heresy... Heresy is when you declare something about Christianity that is a lie to be the truth...

I don't care what you believe or what you do with your time. All due respect You aren't anything in my eyes. I don't know you.

Actually, it's your polka-dotted underwear. HERETIC!

If god gives you a brain and doesn't want you to think, there lies the problem.

E. Trying to suck your own penis in the shower