Why wouldn't East European countries reach an agreement to send observers to Syria & see what's going on there?

Since East European countries are neither Shiite nor Sunni, are more democratic then Arab League countries, are likely to be objective, and are closer to Syria then West Europe & the USA is, why shouldn't Russia, Poland, Greece and other countries decide to send observers, in order to hult the bloodshed, maybe even to broker some peace agreement, and show the USA that it is more their business then the USA's or the West's. After all, when millions were butchered in Southen Sudan, the West hardly spoke about it. It cut off ties with Sudan due to... a failed attempt on Mubarak's life (and says nothing now, when Mubarak's life is in real danger), not due to millions killed in Southern Sudan. It also bloked attempts to invest organ arvesting in and around Kosovo Metohija. the mainstream Western media hardly expresses any concern regarding horrible farm murders (victims of which are Boer farmers, and the motive of which is racism) in South Africa, and threats of Genocide made by some extremist thugs within the ANC and elsewhere, once Mandela dies. So, in short, what does the West have that East European countries don't, and why do they wait for the West and wouldn't send observers to Syria themselves?