Economic lesion for conservatives!!!?

The people that say gov doesn't create jobs are wrong. Gov employs more people than any other entity and every one of those jobs was created.

America is in the process of a crumbling infra structure and we need jobs created to prevent the looming disasters but gov has been irresponsibly spending. America could be using the interest it pays on the money it has borrowed to fund THOUSANDS of jobs.

It was as recent as the yr. 2000 when America had surplus money that could be used to create the much needed jobs to fix the infra structure. Enter GWB and everything changed.

FDR created thousands of jobs w/ work programs. Eisenhower hired thousand to build the interstate road system. Every time a new public school gets built, gov created more jobs. Every time some one enlists in the military that job was created by gov.

The reps need to come to grips w/ socialism is an integral part of American society. It's already firmly embedded.

I have $100.

I want to buy a T.V. so I will, thus spurring economic activity and creating jobs (making and selling T.V.s).

Or:

I have $100.

The government takes my $100 in taxes and buys a tank, thus creating a job making and selling tanks.

I now have $0, so I don't buy a T.V.

Did the government create a job? Obviously not, they just redistributed it from the T.V. industry to the tank industry. The government can not create jobs because they can not create wealth, they can only redistribute it.

you're complicated what some say with what they might or will possibly no longer have self belief. What you think the conservatives are asserting approximately "loose marketplace financial equipment correcting itself" is In My Humble Opinion a spin on deregulation. those human beings communicate deregulation and different such issues by means of fact rules would avert their potential to maximise earnings. Does that advise that they suspect in deregulation or that the loose marketplace will splendid itself ? i could ought to declare that they in all threat merely have self belief those issues whilst it relatively is of their hobbies to realize this and whilst it relatively is finally against their hobbies they'll tell a different tale. it relatively is to declare if rules or a marketplace incredibly controlled by the guidelines or rules is of their hobbies they'll say something to that effect. Or to declare it yet in a different way If rules decrease opposition in a marketplace they are already in then they'll in all threat say that this would properly be a solid factor, yet whilst the guidelines even for the time of this constrained marketplace finally limit some potential to maximise earnings they'll on a similar time say this would properly be a bad factor.

ROFLMAO!!! You do realize that your cute little "equation" is nothing more than the fevered fantasy of a debunked, discredited theorist... don't you?

Government can't spend money without first taking it from the private sector. Then, after the bureaucrats all take their personal cut, whatever remains is ostensibly "returned" (i.e., doled out based upon political patronage).

Your corrected equation reads: C + I + NX - G + q[G]

(where q = something between 0.1 and 0.8)

You know, in my field a lesion is a sore of some variety. I guess in economics a lesion is entirely different.

Yes, I am mocking your mastery of the English language.

The government is in dept even as we speak.