Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If a secular adoption agency drugged young women and stole their babies, would they still be in business?

BQ: Would people still support that agency both financially and as a source of morality world wide?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Sadly, framing the real culprits in this bait & switch baby mill story isn't enough to spark any real outrage since people just assume their local indoctrination branch of religion wasn't involved.

    Pretty much the same justification or apologist mindset dominates the justification mindset of catholics who willingly support their religion in spite of the wide knowledge that the catholic church continues to appease and support an entrenched system of allowing known pedophiles and child predators, religious institution Carte Blanche that shields these "holier than thou" men from being held accountable by the rule of law.

    Source(s): history
  • Like Harvesting Body Parts From The Homeless...

  • Corey
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    They would have been shut down.

    "Those involved thought they were doing the right thing. Looking back was it wrong...yes, but at the time it was not so clear."

    Bull ****. I'm sick and tired of moral relativists making excuses for religious institutions performing and supporting atrocious actions. Here's a hint, if you have to drug and lie to women to take their babies, then it's wrong and you already know it. It happened as recently as 1987, and I happened to have been alive at that time, and knew stealing babies was wrong. So no ******* excuses, "thought they were doing the right thing." How would you like it if someone kidnapped your children, told you they had died, and when confronted with it years later they got away with it because they "thought they were doing the right thing"? You sicken me.

  • 4 years ago

    particular, there will be many destructive repercussions to society often and to Christians particularly. it variety of feels as though the minority is set to get rid of the rights of persons to freedom of speech and of religion. They call for their "rights" yet trample on everyone who disagrees with them. you realize that expression, "Sow the wind, gain the whirlwind?" nicely, merely wait till finally we see the outcomes on society of the erosion of ethical values and the cost of the kinfolk unit - and by using kinfolk unit I advise a father and a mom who're married to a minimum of one yet another and who take care of their offspring. we stay in an age the place human beings "call evil stable and strong evil, who placed darkness for mild and lightweight for darkness... for they have rejected the regulation of the Lord Almighty" (Isaiah 5:20-24). I grant no apology for protecting the rights of Christians and upholding the be attentive to God.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    Judging history by today's standards. At the time it was very hard for a single woman to raise a child. Those involved thought they were doing the right thing. Looking back was it wrong...yes, but at the time it was not so clear.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    HEEELLLLL NAAAHHH

  • 9 years ago

    I should hope not.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.