Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
The sum of equally spaced chords?
How much wire does it take to make a grid by wrapping wire around pegs installed along the circumference of a circle (spaced equally along a singe axis)?.
Here's a crude representation of half of the circle and what I'm talking about:
..............................
..............................|
..........................|...|
......................|...|...|
...................|..|...|...|
...................|..|...|...|
......................|...|...|
..........................|...|
..............................|
I found the answer in terms of a hideous sum but I'm hoping someone can find a closed form for it.
1 Answer
- mcbengtLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
Let n denote the number of lines you are using.
If n is small, I do not think you can do better than what you are doing: a messy-looking sum of lengths, one for each line segment in the sum. A nice, easily-worked-with-by-hand closed form is probably not possible. But a calculator or computer would have no trouble evaluating an exact formula for small n.
For large n a useful approximation comes to mind. If you have taken a circle of radius r, and overlaid n equally spaced parallel lines over it from one end to the other, then the distance between any two consecutive lines is [the diameter of the circle]/n = (2r)/n. So if you multiply the sum of the lengths of the lines by (2r)/n you get a quantity with geometric meaning.
((2r)/n) * [the sum of the lengths of the line segments]
= the sum of ((2r)/n) * [the length of each line segment]
= the sum of [the area of a rectangle whose width is (2r)/n and whose height is the length of a line segment]
which is the area of a sort of "rectangular approximation" to the circle. If n is large in comparison to r, this rectangular region will be very close to the circle, so its area will be approximately the same as the area of the circle. Writing ~= for "approximately equal to", you can therefore expect ((2r)/n) [the sum of the lengths] ~= pi r^2, and hence
[the sum of the lengths] ~= (n pi r)/2
when n is large in comparison to r.
Not knowing anything about the specifics of the application, I'd recommend using the exact formulas (and a computer) if n is small in comparison to r, and otherwise, using this approximation. Even when n/r is only about as big as 10 or so, the approximation is already OK; if n/r is like 100, it is quite good.