Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
7 Answers
- ?Lv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
Twelve years ago I would have said yes, I miss him. But when Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas decided to grant a certain Republican's request to stop trying to count all of the ballots, I was too devastated to continue admiring the man in that video.
On July 1, 1987, Reagan announced that he was nominating Judge Robert Bork for a seat on the US Supreme Court. In the announcement, he said "Judge Bork, widely regarded as the most prominent and intellectually powerful advocate of judicial restraint, shares my view that judges' personal preferences and values should not be part of their constitutional interpretations. The guiding principle of judicial restraint recognizes that under the Constitution it is the exclusive province of the legislatures to enact laws and the role of the courts to interpret them."
And GWB said those same ideas were going to guide him, too, in choosing who to nominate to the Court. But when GWB asked for that injunction to stop the recounts in Florida, and when I thought through all of the possible "constitutional" reasoning that would support that request, I KNEW that GWB doesn't really understand the concept of "judicial restraint." And when Reagan's appointees to the Court granted GWB's request for that injunction, I knew as well that those appointees didn't really believe in the concept either.
- TheOnlyBeldinLv 79 years ago
Ah, the times when we actually had a real leader instead of the moron we have now.
One of his better jokes was about the woman who was getting married for the fourth time but was still a virgin. When asked how that was possible, she explained that her first husband died of a heart attack on their wedding night. The second time, she and her husband had a fight at the wedding and never consummated it. Her third husband was a Democrat, and all he did was sit at the end of the bed for four years and tell her how good it was going to be.
- USAF 1983-1987Lv 79 years ago
Nope...ronnie's cut n run in beirut after he got our Marines murdered was sad, and his involvement in "iran/contra" was treason.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous9 years ago
Yes. I fear we will never have the honor and privilege of having another like him.
- 9 years ago
Hell fuking no!!!!...He's the one who started the American debacle...