Can we agree on this point?

yes

You can SEE Jupiter, it's very bright and quite easy to see. You cannot, however, see any god, nor can you do what you would for anything else you know if you eanted to check it: view the compelling evidence if you so wished, rather than making the very safe assumption that all those who HAVE seen the evidence and written about it etc. were not lying, what with peer review and all. With the Bible and other holy texts, not only are there logical inconsistencies, but in historical pre-scientific times, it would have been easy for a bunch of myths to become accepted and written down without anybody questioning its veracity.

There is a big difference between believing that Jupiter existence and believing in a god. We have seen Jupiter and have scientific evidence of Jupiter. there is none for God. If we had better technology we would be able to land on Jupiter/

If a child thinks his/her parents will help him/her ride a bike, do they have faith? Or do they just trust their parents?

Faith = Belief without evidence, not confidence or trust based on no evidence.

"The existence of Jupiter is something most people will believe as fact despite never seing it themselves nor the data supporting such claims"

Er, there's scientific proof that Jupiter exists. There is no proof that any deity exists.

Romans 10:17 So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

No. Not if you define 'faith' as inherently having to do with a deity. Such a definition would be limited and thus inaccurate.

enable Me explode a fantasy. the middle fold and canopy females are basically as straight forward looking as the different lady without makeup, lighting fixtures, a stable airbrushing, laptop enhancement and posturing. Magazines have offered the international a proposition that "Perfection" is "attractiveness". faux attractiveness isn't actual attractiveness. women human beings desire to look like the epitome of femininity, as shown with the aid of the "eye-catching human beings" on television. adult men like women human beings to be organic. we adore, love or perhaps lust when you for Who you easily are, no longer what fantasy You characterize. we adore curves and freckles and those stray bits of hair that brush Your face. we adore bare ft, pony-tails, abdomen buttons, organic nails, and in straight forward terms the barest hint of makeup. My chum, Natalie, replaced right into a Los Vegas instruct lady. She does not positioned on lots makeup now. She does not want too. She is 'large' sufficient basically as She is. She is all the above. We, i.e. adult men, are seen with the aid of women human beings's Magazines to be too stupid to recognize what we adore.......yet we don't purchase Cosmopolitan, style or Seventeen.....You do. So basically Who has been lead up the backyard process stereotypical attractiveness? makeup is for women those with flaws that would desire to be hidden. Max element made a occupation from with the flexibility to instruct "straight forward Jane" into Jane Mansfield. basically be your self. it is a superb purchase greater decrease priced and better on your complexion. Who knows, you're able to easily take exhilaration in the liberty.

Why do idiot Xtians sometimes respond with a massive wall of text that they clearly do not understand.

It takes a whole lot of faith to rely on that brake pedal every time.

No, I disagree.