Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How to prove (tan12)(tan48)(tan54)(tan72) = 1 without using a calculator?
All angles are in degrees. I was stumped on this!
7 Answers
- Kali PrasadLv 69 years agoFavorite Answer
we have
tanθ tan(60° - θ) tan (60° + θ) = tan3θ.
( refer to http://schoolnotes4u.blogspot.in/search/label/1.3-... for the proof
put θ =12 to get
tan 12 tan(60 - 12) tan (60 + 12) = tan 3 * 12
=> tan 12 tan 48 tan 72 = tan 36
=> tan 12 tan 48 tan 72 = cot (90-36) = cot 54 = 1/ tan 54
=> (tan12)(tan48)(tan54)(tan72) = 1
proved
edit : it is not for my solution but for pinkgreen
8x^3-4x+1=0 is satisfied by sin 18
because
sin 72° = 2 sin 36° cos 36° by the double angle relationship.
sin 72° = 4 sin 18° cos 18° (1 - 2sin2 18°) by the double angle relationship, again.
cos 18° = 4 sin 18° cos 18° (1 - 2sin2 18°) by the cofunction properties: sin 72° = cos 18°.
1 = 4 sin 18° (1 - 2sin2 18°) Let x = sin 18°, this is known as
1 = 4x(1-2x2) substitution, a useful technique in calculus.
8x3-4x+1 = 0
so sin 18 is exact root and why pinkgreen considers approximate is beyond my comprehension.
then the solution become complete
- gôhpihánLv 79 years ago
Let x = 12 degrees ==> 3x = 36, 5x = 60
==> cos(3x) = cos(36), cos(5x) = 1/2
Let y = 3x ==> cos(y) = cos36, cos(4y) = cos144
==> cos(4y) + cos(y) = cos144 + cos36 = cos(180 - 36) + cos36
==> cos(4y) + cos(y) = cos144 + cos36 = -cos(36) + cos36
==> cos(4y) + cos(y) = cos144 + cos36 = 0
==> cos(4y) + cos(y) = 0
==> 2cos²(2y) - 1 + cos(y) = 0
==> 2 [ 2cos²(y) - 1 ]² + cos(y) - 1 = 0
==> 8cos⁴(y) - 8cos²(y) + cos(y) + 1 = 0, let z = cos(y)
==> 8z^4 - 8z^2 + z + 1 = 0
Trial and error shows that z = -1, z = 1/2 are the roots to the above equation
==> (z - 1)(2z - 1)(4z^2 - 2z - 1) = 0
By zero product property, solve for z gives z = -1, 1/2, (1/4)(1 - √5), (1/4)(1 + √5)
But since z = cos(y) = cos(36), 0 < z < 1, thus z = (1/4)(1 + √5) is the only solution
Thus cos(36) = (1 + √5)/4 ................. (*)
==> sec(36) = 4/(1 + √5)
==> sec²(36) = 8/(3 + √5) = 2(3 - √5), by rationalizing denominator
==> sec²(36) - 1 = 5 - 2√5
==> tan²(36) = 5 - 2√5
==> 1 - tan²(36) = 2√5 - 4
==> 1/(1 - tan²(36)) = (2 + √5)/2 ................. (**)
tanx * tan4x
= (sin4x * sinx)/(cos4x * cosx)
= (2sin4x * sinx)/(2cos4x * cosx)
= [cos(3x) - cos(5x)] / [cos(5x) + cos(3x) ], by Product to Sum formulae
= [ (1 + √5)/4 - (1/2) ] / [ (1/2) + (1 + √5)/4 ]
= [ (1 + √5) - 2 ] / [ 2 + (1 + √5) ]
= (√5 - 1)/(√5 + 3), then rationalize denominator
= √5 - 2 ................. (***)
Hence
tan12 * tan48 * tan54 * tan72
= tan(x) * tan(4x) * 1/tan(90 - 54) * tan(6x)
= tan(x) * tan(4x) * 1/tan(36) * tan(6x)
= tan(x) * tan(4x) * 1/tan(3x) * tan(6x)
= tan(x) * tan(4x) * 1/tan(3x) * 2tan(3x)/(1 - tan²(3x)), by Double Angle Formula
= 2 * tan(x) * tan(4x) * 1/(1 - tan²(3x))
= 2 * (√5 - 2) * (2 + √5)/2
= 1
@Kali Prasad: ahaha! Nice~
- sokinLv 45 years ago
convinced, I loved math in college, till I got here to school this year. we've now a large form of Mathamatica crap, and its all on-line homework. the instructor reads the examples from the e book, so now i have no theory what i'm doing. :/ next semester will be exciting, seeing as I quite managed to bypass Calc I and am now going into Calc II... humorous seeing that i have continuously had As in math.
- 5 years ago
x=tan12*tan48*tan54*tan72
=tan48*tan12*cot36*cot18
=sin48/cos48*sin12/cos12*cos36/sin36*cos18/sin18
x*cos48*cos12*sin36*sin18=sin48*sin12*cos36*cos18
x*1/2*(cos60+cos36)*sin18*sin36=1/2*(cos36-cos60)*cos18*cos36
x/2*(cos60*sin18+cos36*sin18)*cos54=1/2*(cos36*cos18-cos60*cos18)*sin54
x/2*(1/2*sin18+1/2*sin54-1/2*sin18)*cos54=1/2*(1/2*cos54+1/2*cos18-1/2*cos18)*sin54
x/2*1/2*sin54*cos54=1/2*1/2*cos54*sin54
x/4*sin54*cos54=1/4*sin54*cos54
Thus x=1
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- PinkgreenLv 79 years ago
LHS=
sin(12*)sin(48*)sin(54*)sin(72*)/
[cos(12*)cos(48*)cos(54*)cos(72*)]=
(-2)sin(12*)sin(48*)(-2)sin(54*)
sin(72*)/[2cos(12*)cos(48*)
2cos(54*)cos(72*)]=
[cos(60*)-cos(36*)][(cos(126*)-
cos(18*)]/{[cos(60*)+cos(36*)]
[cos(126*)+cos(18*)]}=
[0.5-cos(36*)][-sin(36*)-cos(18*)]/
{[0.5+cos(36*)][-sin(36*)+cos(18*)]}=
[0.5-(1-2sin^2(18*)][-2sin(18*)-1]/
{[0.5+(1-2sin^2(18*)][-2sin(18*)+1]}=
[-0.5+2sin^2(18*)][2sin(18*)+1]/
{[1.5-2sin^2(18*)][2sin(18*)-1]}=
1 =
RHS approximately.
The reason is as follows:
Let sin(18*)=x, and let
(-0.5+2x^2)(2x+1)/
[(1.5-2x^2)(2x-1)]=1
then
-x-0.5+4x^3+2x^2=3x-1.5-4x^3+2x^2
=>
8x^3-4x+1=0
=>
The equation has 3 real roots one of
which is x=0.3090169=sin(18*)
approximately.
This shows that there is no error during
the proof, but the given product on the left
of the equation is approximately=1 only.
- YirmiyahuLv 79 years ago
you probably need to apply double-angle, triple-angle and half-angle formulae to work this out.