Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
what must a monarch achieve to be referred to as "the Great" ?
in your opinion will Elizabeth be referred to as Elizabeth the Great?
4 Answers
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
There is nothing in particular that someone must achieve.
Usually, "the Great" was appended to someone's name because he or she did something very striking in terms of conquest or utterly altering the character of the nation socially or politically or intellectually.
However, we don't use such epithets today and that one has been used for only one monarch in the UK -- the medieval King Alfred, who was the precursor to a unified English monarchy. If Elizabeth I wasn't called "the Great," Elizabeth II won't be. She is, after all, only a constitutional monarch without the powers, potential, and possibilities for altering her nation that her much earlier predecessors had.
- heyheyLv 69 years ago
No ..adding those type of suffixes after a monarchs name fell out of practice many centuries ago .they were used to differentiate between Monarchs with the same name.Now they just have the Roman numerals to show which George, Edward etc that they were/are
In the past a Monarch who was known as Great would probably have been remembered as a great military leader (The names were given many years after the Monarchs death )
- 9 years ago
In the modern times, adding 'the great' is impossible. That's so ancient. That's why world monarchs uses Roman numerals after their regnal name.
- Mummy of 2Lv 79 years ago
I think mainly anyone with 'the Great' gave themselves that title, e.g. Alexander the Great.