What is more important: lower taxes or better USA?

A better USA is more important. The USA has the highest levels of income inequality in the developed world. Countries with a higher level of income inequality have:

- Higher poverty rates

- Higher levels of violence and homicide

- Higher prison population

- Lower life expectancy

- Higher obesity and lower overall health.

Source - The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_an...

Republicans forget: 1/3 of the stimulus was tax cuts.

Obama reduced taxes for 95% of working Americans, giving us the biggest tax cut package in history.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individu...

Food-insecurity in the US is at the highest number ever recorded, with 1 in 4 – 16 million -- American kids and 7.5 million seniors going to bed hungry.

The US poverty rate has risen to 46.9 million people, up for the fourth consecutive year. Moving out of poverty is nearly impossible without some form of government assistance. And, unfortunately, among industrialized countries, the US has one of the highest poverty rates, while we are among those that spend the least to combat it.

https://www.charitysub.org/hunger-in-america

GOP to Hungry Americans: You Can Starve

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/59613...

Republicans Block Child Nutrition Bill

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/02/republicans-...

Republicans say no to healthy school lunches

http://grist.org/school-lunches/2011-06-01-down-wi...

Republicans slash Food Stamps just because

http://www.care2.com/causes/republicans-slash-food...

GOP to Sick Americans: You Can Die

http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2012/02/why-do-re...

##

1) that may be a no brainer 3) Low taxes keep the financial system going and the coffers full do to the expanded sales. Liberal hero JFK knew this, why is it a thriller to present day socialist. 6) Secret reply, cozy the border for crying out loud. No country can exist without sovereignty, it is the most elementary aspect having a nation. 5) although the President does not directly manipulate this he can support foster it with sound fiscal insurance policies and a constructive relationship with the Fed Chairman. 4) once more the President does now not push a button to manage inflation but sound fiscal policy must do the trick. 2) Low taxes and a excellent economic system will handle unemployment. The employment quandary appears good regardless of the gloom and doom spread by means of the media.

I'll have to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that increased government spending is always good for the economy, and that a fiscally responsible government is always bad for the economy.

Why can't we eliminate government. It is proven to be less efficient over and over again, and burdens business, and things that WOULD NEVER happen in a business happen regularly in government, ex. GSA, and people are never fired, when we all know there is turn over in business as C and D players are cut, that exist everywhere.

Fiscally responsible anyone...would

fix entitlements

shrink government

simplify tax code

cut the pay to play game out of Washington

get the lawyers out of our lives

get the regulations out of our lives

and get competition in the schools

Not to mention that wealth trickels up from ahealthyy middle class. TheWrigley'ss bought Catalina Island off of California from the sale of one five cent pack of gum at at a time.

Better USA.

Both were more probable under the administration of Ron Paul.

Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are peas of a pod.

Another liberal with a plan to tax ourselves rich.

It is working very well in Europe.

Tax cuts = Happier people = Better USA.

Oh yes, the green energy black hole

How about this: if it was viable, would it need my tax dollars? What if its just a waste of money and the money pit i think it is?

So more government spending on things that are going to go bankrupt and destroy all of those temporary, expensive jobs you advocate.