Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

To u, was Austin's heel turn in 2001 a bad decision or a good decision?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Bad decision

    That heel turn was only to gather pace for the Alliance and the 'mole' storyline. Also, in the same sense, Kurt Angle's heel turn was also a bad decision because both were just to give the Alliance a belief that you would think that, with Austin and Angle, the Alliance would win the war. Thing is, since Austin and Angle were so pro-WWE even before that, what would make people believe that the Alliance could win? There was no chance in them winning. Vince wasn't gonna give a crappy angle an ending that would lead to WCW and ECW owning WWE, no, that ain't Vince, he wanted to bury Heyman, ECW and WCW and create a major story that would lead to WWE winning

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Good decision, He drew (not sure if I spelt that right) so much heat. It's good to have someone be face for a few years then go Heel

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    It didn't make a difference really be can be a 'good guy' or a 'bad guy' and the fans still love him, just like Randy Orton at this current time. He RKOs his tag team partners and everyone cheers him. Lol I wouldn't want to be his partner!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.