Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

I would like someone from ISRO ansswer this. Why can't we build a rocket at a space station like ISS?

That would eliminate the huge amount of fuel needed for take-off. Another advantage would be since escape velocity and gravity (of Earth ) is much lower rather almost zero. So all the force will only accelarate the space-ship more and more giving us enough velocity to make a manned trip to Mars.

Can use smaller rockets with multi-stages may be 10 or 12 or even more. Each will add accelaration.

The shuttle will do the transportation of small sections of the space ship.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Well, one way or another - either in pieces, or as a whole, the mass of that ship going to Mars needs to be lofted into orbit.

    When Apollo went to the moon, the actual "moon package" was lofted into orbit by the 1st, 2nd, and partial-burn of the third stages, where it parked. Once in orbit, they inspected their ship, making sure it was ready for a trip to the moon. If it was (and, every time it was) - they burned the 3rd stage again, in a "TLI" - Trans Lunar Injection - burn.

    What you're describing is pretty similar, only instead of putting the pieces together on Earth, and lofting the whole structure, send the pieces up separately, and assemble them in orbit. And, you're right - they'd only need to add about 40% more velocity to their "stack" - and, the forces they'd feel (and the wear & tear on the ship) would be far less.

    Unfortunately, we don't have the shuttle anymore; it would cost more to re-furbish them than to build new ones; Easier still is to go with the Ares-V heavy-lift vehicle on the drawing board (or, maybe use the existing Atlas-V's), and launch the modules that way, unmanned, into orbit for assembly.

  • 9 years ago

    It could be because the ISS isn't a mine, doesn't have metal smelters, or the resources to produce fuel or any machined parts to make rocket engines from.

    EVERYTHING that is used at the ISS MUST be sent to the ISS from Earth.

    Then, there's the issue of the inclination of the ISS' orbit; It's not a useful orbit (being too inclined) for most Earth departure spacecraft.

    So, 0-2.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    NO,you cannot send a rocket into area with out the authorization of the government above all no longer in the usa.It's illegal to launch a rocket int space.However no executive tec can discover a small rocket but when it's a big one they will probobaly attempt to shoot it down.The rocket might go wherever.It could go to the white condominium or the pentagon and blow up there.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    You would expend so much fuel there would be no advantage.Think also about the time line of completing a project like that in a environment that exerts no gravity.Then your idea about a 12 stage vehicle, you would add such complexity to that endeavor especially in that environment.It could take decades to complete the job.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Irv S
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    You could, but:

    * Building something in space presents difficulties not encountered below.

    * You'd still have to lift all the components plus the tools to assemble them

    into orbit, so you don't save over a 'staged' earth launch.

    Once interplanetary missions become more common assembly of vehicles

    in orbit may well become practical.

  • 9 years ago

    Maximum weight PSLV biggest of isro caN LIFT IS ONLY 2 TONS TO EARTH ORBIT

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.