Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How can progressives buy the myth that the parties "switched platforms"?

The myth in the Democrat mind is that somehow Republicans... who fought and died to END slavery and legislated AGAINST the demeaning of "non-whites"... now support slavery and other historically fascistic Democrat platforms. In fact, all the evidence supports that the classic liberalism of the early republicans is EXACTLY what modern conservatives desire to "conserve". If anything the modern progressive wants to abolish classic liberalism and replace this with statism. There is seemingly little to nothing "liberal" in the new progressive worldview... though they apply that term to themselves... they are characteristically more attuned to accept the entitlement-heavy government system of fascist leaders like Mussolini and collectivists like Stalin then to accept true liberal self-determinist views like those espoused by Edmund Burke, Lord Acton, or F.A. Hayek.

This is incontrovertible.

To this end, the Democrats leadership CONTINUES to demean minorities as "helpless" and exploit the "poor" for political purpose by bribing votes for entitlements. The entitlement bribes of notorious racists like LBJ and Grand Dragons of the KKK like Senator Byrd seemed specifically designed to both buy votes and create a culture of government dependence (essentially the socialist's method of returning entire populations to the serfdom-slavery warned of by classic liberals like Lord Acton).

Please, if their is a rational, logic-drive individual among you collectivists, supply the evidence for the "switch". To the sane mind, it seems to be a mythological belief without a drop of substance. I implore you.

Are any of you fact-conscious enough to do the hard research or are all of you simply content to suck this lie down with a straw like those who bought into National Socialists' views on Aryan genetic superiority or the proletariat's benevolence? Do you simply "trust" the state schools, Nationalist Media, and Democrat Machine that have preached many other convenient lies through the years?

The same three institutions, I might add, that once openly supported black enslavement and supplied many fictitious reasons for making many minorities second-class citizens...?

It seems insane not to at least LOOK for the evidence... or would finding an utter lack of it then shatter your zealous "faith" in the power of progressive statism... so you instead refuse to look?

It should at least beg the question if you are a not simply a fanatic for the cause, should it not?

Update:

@Fanatic Progressives - There notof single a verifiable link or shred of reliable evidence in any of your ranting blather. You look more and more insanely gullible all the time.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    One aspect of Liberal ideas and Conservative ideas is: They have to be placed in context.

    Part of the context is their point in Time.

    What our brilliant Founding Fathers provided for all Responsible Citizens is Liberty. To accomplish that, they gave us a constitution that Limits Government and grants the Foundation of Power to the Citizen.

    Why? Why not make themselves Kings? Because they knew that Power Corrupts. So they spread the Power as thinly s possible.

    THAT was a Liberal idea at that time.

    Once established, maintaining that foundation requires careful maintenance and change must be carefully thought out Prior to making those changes. It is foolish to establish a change as an "experiment" because to reverse any damage caused is almost impossible.

    Therefore it is Conservative thought that maintains what is good and resists foolish experimentation.

    Therefore, from the viewpoint of History, what was Liberal became Conservative.

    Now that America has the Best Government Anywhere, we are smart to stay Conservative.

    Conservatives are NOT afraid of Change but they are Smart enough to know that Change must be well thought out.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    I am a Conservative Republican but they are partially correct. The Southern Baptist Democrats who were the religious, globalist, big government (by means of military and police) did create and become the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party. They are the Bush's, McCain, Lindsey Graham's of our party and they are the ones that htink abortion is more important than our economy.

    Now, just as many stayed with the Democrats despite their hatred for the anto-war movement and the socialists especially after LBJ was followed by McGovern in the primaries. These were people like Al Gore's father, Byrd, Hollings.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    The fact that you continue to ask this question over & over, and continue to be obsessed with this topic, shows that you know that deep down that the parties did indeed switch.

    Just as you are constantly obsessed with trying to convince everyone that the right-wing Nazi Party were "Liberals."

    You're insecure about your own position, so you obsess over the topic and continue to repeat the same lie in hopes that you will convince yourself.

    I'll post the same answer I posted the last time I answered your very same question:

    It began to slowly change since the New Deal, but the pivotal moment was 1964, after the Civil Rights Act was signed by a Democratic President, and during the '64 Presidential Elections when Southern Democrats threw their support behind Republican Barry Goldwater, who voted against the Civil Rights Act.

    Richard Nixon also used his "Southern Strategy" to scoop up disenfranchised Segregationists in the South, many being Democrats. In the process, Blacks and Liberals in the Republican Party and elsewhere, began to shift towards the Democrats.

    Southern Conservative Segregationist Democrats have voted Republican ever since.

    Today's Republicans = yesterday's Segregationists.

    Don't be deceived by Cons today who will revise history and claim that Southern Segregationist Democrats were "Liberals", and how they remained Democrats until this day. There's a reason why the Southern States went from being Democrat-dominated for decades to being Republican-dominated since the 1960's. And there's a reason why Blacks historically voted Republican, and now vote Democrat. The ideology didn't change in the south, nor did it among blacks - the only thing that changed was the party label.

  • 9 years ago

    ALABAMA GOVERNOR GEORGE C. WALLACE (D) 1963

    On June 11, 1963, Alabama's Governor George Wallace came to national prominence when he kept a campaign pledge to stand in the schoolhouse door to block integration of Alabama public schools. Governor Wallace read this proclamation when he first stood in the door-way to block the attempt of two black students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, to register at the University of Alabama. President John F. Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard, and ordered its units to the university campus. Wallace then stepped aside and returned to Montgomery allowing the students to enter.

    http://www.archives.state.al.us/govs_list/schooldo...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    The Democrats DID switch their approach to racial equality. They falsely accuse the Republicans of switching too.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    So, genius explain to us why KKK Grand Wizard David Duke was kicked out the Democratic party, but is to this day part of the Republican party?

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    All I know is that it was a REPUBLICAN president that trashed the American economy.

    It was a DEMOCRATIC president that delivered a balanced budget before him and a DEMOCRATIC president leading us out.

    Why would anyone vote for Romney?

    Do they want to take the US back to the Republican policies that led to the worst recession in history?

    It was a REPUBLICAN president that denied that there was a housing bubble and wall street abuses that led to the worst recession in US history. Which we are STILL trying to recover from.

    We want to go back to THAT?

  • 9 years ago

    Do you ever tire of this ignorance? George Wallace was a CONSERVATIVE. He was not a LIBERAL.Abraham Lincoln was a LIBERAL. He was not like George Wallace who was a CONSERVATIVE. The CONSERVATIVE Dixiecrats broke from the Democrats and entered the GOP.

  • Leo
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Gibberish.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    9 years ago

    Which comic book did you read that in?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.