What would happen if conservative christians defended opposition to gay marriage like Ahmadinejad?

Question

Appearing on CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight," Ahmadinejad was asked by host Piers Morgan whether he might willing to acknowledge that “everyone is entitled to be whatever sexuality they are born to be.”

Speaking through a translator, Ahmadinejad responded by asking Morgan, “Do you really believe that someone is born homosexual?” When Morgan answered that he “absolutely” believes that some people are born gay, Ahmadinejad pressed him further.

"I'm sorry. Let me ask you this. Do you believe that anyone is giving birth through homosexuality? Homosexuality ceases procreation,” countered the Iranian leader. “Who has said that if you like or believe in doing something ugly, and others do not accept your behavior, that they're denying your freedom? Who says that? Perhaps in a country they wish to legitimize stealing." 

Ahmadinejad, who is expected to address the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday, also was asked how he would react if one of his two sons or daughter turned out to be gay. 

"Proper education must be given,” he said in the interview that was taped over the weekend. “The education system must be revamped. The political system must be revamped. And these must be also reformed and revamped along the way. But if you — if a group recognizes an ugly behavior or ugly deed as legitimate — you must not expect other countries or other groups to give it the same recognition."

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

They would write the 2012 Republican Platform

? · Answer

In all societies because of fact the daybreak of time a organic and organic order has been known while it comprises a marital unit. That order is the union of a male and a woman. Biologically the only way a species can survive is to maintain on with the organic and organic policies of procreation and for homo sapien it quite is a male and a woman. as a fashion to guard the extra youthful with nurturing mothers and fathers and to stabilize societies the marital contract grew to become the norm. there replaced into no reason to allow any others to marry because of fact it only did not extra healthful the often happening norm of what defines the kinfolk -- male, lady and young ones. There are civil unions, contracts, why is it that homosexuals call for that it quite is seen marriage? you're able to have a miles better threat of having what you choose in terms of each and all the privileges and rights granted to a committed couple in case you're able to drop the "marriage" out of your demands and petition your community governments to renowned civil unions with each and all the criminal rights accruing to it. You suggested separation of church and state: if gay marriages exchange into regulation then the countless church homes could be sure by government quite than theological edicts. And that, Zendong, isn't separation of church and state.

Anonymous · Answer

Haven't got time for anyone who opposes gay marriage.  I'm not gay but  I like to think that I'm a decent human being who doesn't judge others on something so trivial as sexual preferences.  If he wants to see 'ugly' he wants to listen to himself.

Anonymous · Answer

Considering that the conservative Christian fundamentalist started the Civil War,created Jim Crow and the KKK,nothing would surprise me about this vile racist animals as a collective .

tonalc2 · Answer

Perhaps you missed the fact that one of their main arguments (aside from Biblical nonsense) is that sex is for procreation only.  

Which, of course, means that abominations include sterile couples, post-menopausal women, seniors and people who choose to remain childless.

Speed Racer · Answer

Cons have the exact same argument so I guess cons are terrorists

Trending News

What would happen if conservative christians defended opposition to gay marriage like Ahmadinejad?

6 Answers