Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Where does a compact camera wins over a DSLR!!?

In terms of photography only, and not the price issues.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Judas
    Lv 5
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Everyone has rightly mentioned portability and ease of use.

    One other key area where a compact beats a DSLR is deep depth of field. The smaller sensor of a compact camera naturally means that the depth of field is deeper and more of the image is in focus. On a DSLR, you need to stop down the aperture to achieve a deep depth of field and this isn't always possible in low light conditions.

    Other than this, the image quality is worse on a compact in every way.

  • keerok
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Portability. It's a huge issue. With some photographers, it's either they get pictures with something light or nothing at all.

    One instance when a compact wins over a dSLR is if the dSLR is in the hands of a noob who doesn't know a thing about photography while the compact is used by an expert photographer. Even megapixels can't save the noob in this case.

    http://keerok-photography.blogspot.com/2012/09/pic...

  • 9 years ago

    You can pretty much take a P&S anywhere and I'm not just talking about portability. I was just admitted to a concert as a credentialled photographer, but none of us was allowed to take our real camera into the concert! They were allowed for the red carpet event only. I went out to my car and got my trusty P&S, which was allowed inside the concert venue. It's nowhere near as good as my DSLR, but at least I got some snapshots instead of nothing.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/sets/721...

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    If you compare today's compact cameras with something a little bit older, they are so much better - how far back you go sets the standard. But having a camera always available - may be priceless.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Nathan
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    Street shooters like to use compacts and range finders over SLR's as the latter is too conspicuous. A compact or range finder is discreet and people are less likely to notice or take offence. As a result the shot is natural and not so contrived.

  • 9 years ago

    They really only have portability going for them. There isn't anything else that they do 'better' than a DSLR.

    Source(s): Self
  • 9 years ago

    Being compact. Nowhere else.

  • rick
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    That you can take it anywhere easily.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.