Is "It never happenned to me, therefore it is not true" a logical deuction or a fallacy?

Certainly one of the most popular FALLACIES that atheists cling to.

It's a logical fallacy.

"This seems to be one of the top atheist "arguments" seen on Yahoo Answers."

Care to provide an example?

Seeing as how it is, in your words, one of the "top atheist 'arguments' seen", you should have no trouble at all presenting several recent instances where an atheist has actually used this as an argument.

We'll all be waiting with bated breath.

You should limit yourself to one question per post. It avoids confusion.

In answer to your first question, that would be an incorrect deduction.

As to your second question, I have never seen that argument from an atheist.

As to your complaint against Take these words, if you make your questions intentionally vague, get used to people reading things into them. As the original poster, it is your responsibility to post a clear question.

No, a more accurate description would be "People say that 'it' happened to them, but when I ask them what 'it' actually is, they don't give an actual answer, instead simply giving a veiled illusion to something that they are supposedly aware of, that I am not'

If we don't know what 'it' is, it's because NONE of you people actually give a straight answer and articulate what 'it' actually consists of.

So go ahead, what is 'it'? Describe 'it'...

Seems as if the top christian arguement is: 'I know God exists for reasons that I can't actually explain, but if people don't take my word for it then it's their fault not mine for not believing in the God i'm telling them exists'

It is a fallacy but it is also a grave intellectual defect in general. It is the opposite of the scientific temper, which says, Let me LOOK and then understand.

Even if that were the case, it's still a better position than faith.

<edit> There is no requirement to define 'it' in order to discuss the validity of the nature of the original statement. You're only outsmarting yourself, sorry.

I've also never experienced an encounter with leprechauns, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.

Spelling and grammar: It would seem that is a fallacy also.

"Its never happened to anyone, therefore it is likely not true."

That would be a fairer expression of our stance but from your question, you're obviously not trying to play fair.

That's pretty much an argument all idiots use. Guess what idiots like [hint: the internet]...

it has no evidence that can be verified without reading minds, therefore it isn't true