Why not have an atheist category on yahoo answers?

this is it:

>Atheism can be defined as the absence of both Religion and Spirituality

This definition is incorrect. Starting an arguement with a false premise negates your discussion.

have you ever observed that there is a Politics section, yet Yahoo would not extra segregate that and make subgroups for liberals and conservatives? it rather is why your suggestion fails, yet howdy, it somewhat is yahoo's employer. they are able to divide this in any way they want. it rather is too undesirable that would not dictate which sections i will or won't pass to. and that i does no longer pass to an atheist section, i might lots somewhat examine and reply to those that i do no longer already trust.

It cannot. Don't you mean we haven't spirituality? Also, what would atheist discuss on their own? Politics? Or will they just try to prove each other that God is nonexistent?

No. If you leave only believers in one place... they won't be any progressive.

It's funny how you would never find a Christian in the Science category angering atheists but always atheists shoving their beliefs in the Religion & Spirituality category

Atheism actually does not address spirituality in any way. See Buddhists.

Atheism is a religious positiuon, and thus belongs squarely right here.

No, I have Q&A about religion, I'm fine here. This is not a section for religious people (or any other group), nor is it a Christian section. Do you have Q&A about atheism?

How generous of you, giving us a place of our own!

But yes, I agree. Should have an atheist section.

Doesn't mean we don't read on religions. Hell it's been shown atheists know more about religion than the practitioners.

Then they would all agree with each other and nobody would think he could actually help others to think different. All the difficult topics on Answers are deliberately mixed and rightly too.

Too dangerous. The last time we left you without adult supervision we suffered the dark ages.