Can a parent sue a school authority in the UK for encouraging under age sex disguised as care?

School authorities in the UK have allowed school nurses to provide contraceptive implants and injections to girls as young as 13.

The age of consent in the UK is 16.

The school nurses are forbidden to inform the girls parents that they have provided this procedure without the child's consent under confidentiality laws even though the girls receiving this treatment not to get impregnated are under the legal age of consent.

What message does this send out to our children regarding sexual activity and how can a child of 13 have the right to receive contraception without their parents knowledge and permission?

Is this not facilitating irresponsible behaviour that may damage a developing child sexually while they are under age effectively?

Our children are exposed everyday on a conscious level to porn by the use of the smart-phones and computers and on a subliminal level by the hypersexualisation of our society through the media.

Does the Government tacitly condone this as well because in the UK we are experiencing the lowest teenage pregnancy rates since 1969.

If laws though are being broken by children who feel they have the right to break the age of consent then should those laws be lowered 16 to 13?After all is not the school encouraging the children by allowing them the power to receive contraception without the childs parents having any say in the matter and is the school breaking an ethical and morals by doing this in the first place?

Is there an evil in society that is rapacious and predatory and wants only to corrupt our children and destroy their innocence?