Can you believe that Romney wants drone strikes on American citizens and detainment without trial?

Yes, both candidates support that.

As for the "drone strikes" back it up!

As for the unlawful detainment, you're confused. That would be Obama, he asked for it, and a repub, and a dem wrote it up, and Obama then signed it. It's called the National Defense Authorization Act. It's already in effect, and already been deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and still the White House refuses to submit to the ruling. Look it up.

Edit: First off, that link is from the UK, I could care less what they think. Second off, Romney wasn't responsible for it, he's not President. He didn't ask for, or sign off on the NDAA. Obama did. How can you blame Romney for Obama's choices? Get a grip.

pretend. The President will probable no longer detain people indefinitely. I grant authority shrink than, which i'm constructive you will overlook approximately approximately. inspite of each little thing, no statute can overide the Constittuion. Addressing previous conflict with the Obama administration with connection with the wording of the Senate text fabric fabric, the Senate-residing house compromise text fabric fabric, in sub-section 1021(d), additionally affirms that no longer something indoors the Act "is meant to chop back or strengthen the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for use of military rigidity." the proper version of the bill additionally provides, in sub-section(e), that "no longer something in this section would be construed to impress present day regulation or government on the subject of to the detention of usa electorate, lawful resident aliens of the U. S., or distinctive persons who're captured or arrested indoors the U. S.."

Well, Obama signed NDAA into law, so he does too. What great candidates we have this year! A nobel peace prize winner who has killed countless innocents with cowardly drone strikes all over the globe. And the guy who lost to the guy who lost the election last cycle, who would've lost re-election as mass. governor if he ran again, who still can't make up his mind what he believes policy-wise.

The war on terror requires these types of activities regardless of Party affiliation.

That's why we have a President for America.

~(:-)

I think you're forgetting who has their finger on the drone button right now, and a list of potential strikes.

No, but totally uniformed ignorant people like you might.

Obama wants to do it even more!

If you are talking about NDAA, so does Obama.

Source please or are u just screaming out for attention.