Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is this a problem that can happen if the US went to the "popular vote"?
1960:
In the national popular vote, Kennedy beat Nixon by just one tenth of one percentage point (0.1%)—the closest popular-vote margin of the 20th century. In the Electoral College, Kennedy's victory was larger, as he took 303 electoral votes to Nixon's 219.
In 1960, there were "only" 70 million votes cast.
Could you imagine a NATION WIDE HAND-RECOUNT of nearly 120 million votes, as were cast in 2012?
8 Answers
- ?Lv 69 years agoFavorite Answer
yes, there are many scenarios that can occur no matter how votes are cast.
recounts are common and should be heavily encouraged. after all, there is a reason why the Electoral College doesn't cast their ballots until Dec. 18th, and the President isn't sworn in until Jan 20 the following year.
it's to allow time to ensure a fair, n on corrupt election, or even a do-over.
i'm ALL for recounts. i think it should be standard operating procedure.
- Michael TLv 79 years ago
any recount would only be in a given jurisdiction state or riding
if it was a really close vote in Florida fine recount there no need for a recount everywhere else
there would probabl;y be fewer recounts becase they would have less impact on the election
think about it the way it is now with the electoral college in many cases the 29 electoral college votes from Florida could be enough to make either candidate the winner
whereas scratch the electoral college and then those votes are no longer so critical
it might represent a 2 % spread but if a candidate is ahead by 10% in the popular vote that 2 % would not be relevant it would translate to a win of 12 % or 8% in the popular vote but the same candidate wins
with the electoral college 50% +1 vote in California means 55 out of 538 electoral votes
under the rules of the electoral college system it is possible for a candidate to become President with as little as 26 % of the popular vote and that would really suck
- Anonymous4 years ago
i grew to become into in extreme college from 2007-2011 the prevalent teenagers have been cliche and not on an identical time. a million. They positioned on AE, Aeropostal, etc; they have coach bags and wore numerous makeup 2. They have been the youngsters of docs, legal specialists, the wealthy human beings 3. soccer payers have been as stupid as bricks and from time to time no longer the main prevalent. Being athletic (no count the sport) made you greater probably to alter into prevalent, some thing I on no account rightly understood. yet another oddity grew to become into that a lot of human beings in marching band have been prevalent. i.e. they hardly sense decrease than the nerdy, awkward stereotype. 4. you apart from mght defined the prevalent pupils very properly as that it grew to become into comparable right here too. ( famous, humorous, slutty from time to time, they drink, do sexual stuff to get interest, bypass classification yet get stable grades). I constantly theory it grew to become into strange what share prevalent teenagers have been athletic and on the A-honor roll. The cheese growing to be on timber subject is humorous, yet i've got faith that should ensue. There are people who're so stupid, so, so stupid and it is worse in youth.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 69 years ago
If recounting votes is the worst thing that could possibly happen with a popular vote, then I'd be all for it.
And would you look at that, I'm all for it.
- JakobLv 49 years ago
The problem is that NY, Texas, Florida and Cali would determine every single election