Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in Politics & GovernmentGovernment · 8 years ago

Why are they even bothering to inaugurate Obama again?

With the state of our economy in the US, why are they spending megabucks to make a big deal out of the inauguration of a sitting president? As I understand it, there are even going to be two ceremonies - a private one and a public one. Even if the entertainers have donated their time, I’m sure the costs are astronomical, not to mention the money spent on security! Wouldn’t it just be better to have a small ceremony, and not waste all that?

Is an inauguration even legally necessary?

This is not a question asking your opinion of the president or his policies, so PLEASE don’t do that - just try to answer my question.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    An inauguration is one thing and hoopla is another. All the entertainment is unnecessary especially in these hard times. I can see celebrating but not at our expense. A simple upstanding ceremony would be just fine. Also a sitting president should be reasonable about all the extra expense incurred. I am glad folks want to celebrate but all the sensationalism was done at the first one.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    if you read your constitution it says the inauguration takes place on jan 20 at noon time, this was yesterday, to day is just a ceremony to let the public in on it, but in any event the constitution demands it regardless if the president is the same one or a new one

  • 8 years ago

    The law requires he retakes his oath on the 20th of January and he as to then take it in public

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.