Is “God” simply anther name for the “the Higgs boson”?

Question

About 13.75 billion years ago, this is what happened to the universe. At first, there was a sea of energy, a symmetrically uniform point (or block). Suddenly, this block was rapidly exposed to extreme heat. Once it hit about 1015 kelvin – 173 billion times hotter than our Sun’s surface – the block disintegrated into smaller packets called particles. Its symmetry was broken. The Big Bang had happened. There was never “just nothing”
Anyway, the symmetry-breaking also gave rise to some fundamental forces. They’re called ‘fundamental’ because of their primacy, and because they’re still around. They were born because the disturbances in the energy block, encapsulated as the NG bosons, were interacting with an all-pervading background field now called the Higgs field. 
The Higgs field has four components, two charged and two uncharged. You’ll notice that the W+, W-, and Z bosons make up for only three components of the Higgs field. What about the fourth a  component?
The fourth components existence (the Higgs boson) was indicated by the maths, to balance the equations they needed a fourth component.
Is this not similar to the theory of God? The questions we pose need an extra component, rather than make up a name like “the Higgs boson” theists call it “God” not realizing that in doing so they add more problems than they solve.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

That is the way I see it, but I doubt the average believer will have a clue what you are talking about. I personally think it's intuitive to think that "nothing existing" is ridiculous. We live in a universe full of something and haven't the slightest example of nothingness. I realize that I can "imagine" a state of nothingness, but there is no logical reason to think it's possible or ever existed. Especially if you consider that matter/energy can't be created or destroyed. That strongly suggests that matter/energy always existed in one form or the other.

Religious people are intuitive also, but intuition is much more subjective than logic. Intuition is what makes sense to "you". If you fill your head full of God nonsense than God will be intuitive to you. What makes my trust my intuition is that my logic backs it up. I always put my intuition through the logic test and so do the brilliant scientists who come up with these ideas.

nameless · Answer

Is “God” simply anther name for the “the Higgs boson”?

~~~ No! It was a joke name!
Who would have thought that ignorant Xtians would have mindlessly taken it to be somehow, 'proof', self-validation, of a 'God'.
It is ignorant nonsense! Emotionally, egoically needy 'thinking'.

The td just demonstrates the truth of my words!

? · Answer

undergo in strategies that for the period of the old language, there have been no vowels and the letter Y replaced into interchangeable with J and W with V. via fact of this everybody is asserting God's call is Yahweh AND Jehovah.

Loosey™ · Answer

Don't forget quarks.  Two up quarks and one down quark, a TRINITY if you like, make a proton and therefore make most all of the baryonic matter (hey, that's us!) in the universe.

Josh K · Answer

God is another name for "I don't know what happened and am too lazy to study, so f*ck it"

Gregory · Answer

no god is a real living being

Alexis · Answer

It would explain why Catholics go to mass.

Cyber · Answer

No

Anonymous · Answer

Can I recommend a good science book? Please?

? · Answer

No.

Trending News

Is “God” simply anther name for the “the Higgs boson”?

10 Answers