Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Gun Owners: Alan Gottlieb and SAF SUPPORTS Toome/Manchin Bill!?
Alan Gottlieb of the SAF (Second Amendment Foundation) SUPPORTS the Toome/Manchin (not the Shumer parts) bill. It seems they've weeded almost all of Shumer our of it and it APPEARS to HELP gun owners on many levels. What to you think?
Here's what it will do FOR Gun owners
5 Answers
- Anonymous8 years agoFavorite Answer
This Bill is not going to improve the identification of those mentally ill or
criminal element seeking to buy firearms. It will only erode and take away
honest law abiding Americans of their second Amendment rights, Under
no circumstance should anyone trust for one second something brought
forward by Barack Obama or his Administration. It is back loaded with
rights decaying verbage,
- ?Lv 78 years ago
Not acceptable to an American.
You LOSE YOUR RIGHTS based SOLELY on an administrative "accusation" of mental illness and have to GET A COURT ORDER to get them back and CAN NEVER DO SO after a deadline has passed.
This is exactly backwards. An American - by definition - would tolerate loss of rights due to mental illness ONLY through ADJUDICATION with NO expiration of the right to petition for relief.
Didn't bother with the rest of the Bill. It cannot be tolerated.
- Mark in TimeLv 58 years ago
In light of the Supreme Court affirming incorporation of the 2nd Amendment in the 14th with McDonald v. Chicago (561 U.S. 3025) in 2010, inconsistant gun laws by the various states will have to be re-examined. Eventually I can see a single federal law ensuring minimum gun rights to all citizens regardless of the state they live in or travel through.
- Uncle PennybagsLv 78 years ago
I've looked up exactly what this compromise bill is supposed to do. As far as I can tell, it requires a background check for gun show sales, or sales resulting from an online ad. But person to person sales amongst "friends and neighbors" still do not require them.
I'm still wary, but if done right, its effects are pretty minimal.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.