atheists proofed that the Bible is true...?

If you hadn't written "about everything" at the end, I would still be deciding whether or not you were trolling.

Science is defined as “the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.”

Science in and of itself isn't wrong, however, some "Scientists" are not always correct in how they interpret things.

Because the Bible details historical events, its truthfulness and accuracy are subject to verification like any other historical document. Through both archaeological evidences and other writings, the historical accounts of the Bible have been proven time and time again to be accurate and true. In fact, all the archaeological and manuscript evidence supporting the Bible makes it the best-documented book from the ancient world. The fact that the Bible accurately and truthfully records historically verifiable events is a great indication of its truthfulness when dealing with religious subjects and doctrines and helps substantiate its claim to be the very Word of God.

Unlike mythology, the Bible has a historical framework. Its characters are real people living in verifiable locations during historical events. The Bible mentions Nebuchadnezzar, Sennacherib, Cyrus, Herod, Felix, Pilate, and many other historical figures. Its history coincides with that of many nations, including the Egyptian, Hittite, Persian, Babylonian, and Roman empires. The events of the Bible take place in geographical areas such as Canaan, Syria, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and others. All this certifiable detail refutes the idea that the Bible is mere mythology.

The Bible has many confirmations in sciences such as biology, geology, astronomy, and archaeology. The field of biblical archaeology has absolutely exploded in the last century and a half, during which time hundreds of thousands of artifacts have been discovered. Just one example: at one time, skeptics used the Bible’s references to the Hittite civilization as “proof” that the Bible was a myth. There was never any such people as the “Hittites,” according to the science of the day. However, in 1876, the first of a series of discoveries was made, and now the existence of the ancient Hittite civilization is well documented. Archaeology continues to bolster the Bible’s historicity. As Dr. Henry M. Morris has remarked, “There exists today not one unquestionable find of archaeology that proves the Bible to be in error at any point.”

"For one factor, Jesus made many predictions that got here genuine. He even said that in the final days there could be earthquakes and rumors of wars and wars." anybody would predict that. I predict there will be a flood that kills plenty of people someday sooner or later. I predict conflict. I predict a volcano will erupt. Does this make this publish divinely inspired? No. "also, the Koran is simply too violent." Your point being? Possibly God is violent. "The Koran says that men and women who are trying to transform you to yet another religion must die." read Deuteronomy 13:6-9 related to loved ones contributors who worship other gods and take a look at and convert you. Hint: it includes killing them. "It also endorses slavery." As does the Bible. "Nothing like that might have come from God." relies how you define God. For those who believe in the Biblical God, it would have. You may have outlined God in a detailed manner (founded on the Bible) then claim that the Koran can not be divine for the reason that it does not meet the personality of God. Except the very fact the similarities are startling, you may have based all of it on a false premise, with greater than a trace of circular reasoning. Your argument, simplified, is this: > God is how he is described within the Bible (an unsupported premise) > The Koran does not in shape that description (distinct religion, not stunning if there are differences) > The Bible DOES healthy that description (well...Of path, the description is based on the Bible) > for this reason the Bible is divine, whilst the Koran is just not. If I come to a decision to descibe God as he's described within the Gospel of the FSM i can, utilising the identical common sense, show the Gospel of the FSM is divine, whilst the Bible just isn't. > God is how he is described in the Gospel of the FSM > The Bible would not healthy that description > The Gospel of the FSM DOES in shape that description > for that reason the Gospel of the FSM is divine, while the Bible is just not.

Science is wrong about everything. Really?

Better to go to the witch-doctor if you are ill, than seek the help of a doctor in science based medicine.

The Quran predicts that some people won't believe Mohammed's stories about Allah. I guess that means Islam is true, huh?

Or does it...?

Nonsense! It`s proof that the people who wrote the bible knew that one day their scam would be discovered.

I predicted years ago that at least once a day I would see a theist with atrocious grammar and lo and behold you came along today.

Atheists prove the Quran too then!

Harry Potter must be true because in the first book it says Harry will kill Voldemort and in the seventh book he does!

Really? So...Harry Potter books say that owls can fly. I guess that makes Harry Potter true, too, right?