Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

the nature of phylogenetic branching?

In evolution, we all know that it is not a linear path such as:

single cell -> fish -> reptile -> monkey -> human

It is rather a kind of branching tree of life to show common ancestor such as A evolved B and C, then B evolved D and E etc..

However, this kind of tree of life is still nothing more than a multiple linear process, we can still identify a single path from the tree, e.g. A -> B -> D or A -> B ->E in the above example.

So, my question is what exactly the difference between evolutionary tree of life and linear path BY THEIR VERY NATURES?

Thanks

1 Answer

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 6
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    The linear path implies that evolution is directed and has a specific path to follow. Of course, this isn't true - evolution is undirected and has no pre-determined path, which is why the tree is a better representation.

    To put it another way, the tree is a less biased sampling than the path, because the path is necessarily a subset of some tree.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.