Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 years ago

Do liberals understand a federal judge can compel you to testify before Congress?

if you make a statement before Congress regarding allegations you have waived your right to plea the 5th. Congress can get a court order from a federal judge compelling you to testify. If you take the 5th at that point you are not in contempt of Congress, you are in contempt of court since that is where the order to testify came from. The judge can jail you until you testify.

Do people understand this or is there something hard to understand about this?

Update:

@ james- You are confused. If you make a statement after being sworn in you have just waived your 5th amendment rights. That is the law. Why else do you think Jimmy Hoffa would plea the 5th when senators would ask him his name? he had a good lawyer. Lerner does not have a good lawyer. After being sworn in she should not have made a statement. But because she did it opens her up to a court order to testify.

16 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    No not at all "if you make a statement before Congress regarding allegations "

    that makes no sense that you lose your 5th for that, I dont think you know about what you speak.

    So if you make a statement the government can water board you? Do you really know what the fifth amendment is?

  • 8 years ago

    Congress is not a forum absent of 5th Amendment protections. It may very well be a wise move to require a more formalized legal proceeding considering the concerns. Never know if the IRS employees were acting at the direction or discretion of members of Congress.

    edit: Should there be information related to Congress' involvement or discretion concerning the issues, the matters cannot rightfully be heard in Congress, so it needs to be heard in a Court. In that event, or a similar one, 5th Amendment rights uphold that checks and balances requirement.

  • 8 years ago

    ANY statement you make while under oath is supposed to preclude the 5th. When you star talking you give up your ability to claim the 5th. If you take the stand and upon the first question you claim it your good. But you can't claim ignorance of a certain thing and then plead the 5th. you can't know and not know at the same time,.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    If in fact he did personally sign the warrants.....he certainly should have known about it..... If he delegated the authority to sign, he can escape culpability but not responsibility.... Both Eric Holder and Barrak Obama are racists (want proof....I can post proof) Both Eric Holder and Barrak Obama are incompetent ( also proveable ) Eric Holder is the worst Director of the Department of Justice in history....is indirectly responsible for Americans losing their lives..... and I say that in full knowledge of the incompetency of Janet Reno

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    No one can compel me to testify as a free man.

    They can offer punishment at best if I don't but thats it. You only have as much power as I allow you to have.

    If I were a vindictive man, I could tell that judge that no matter what he says I'm going to put him down like a rabid dog. Do you really think that if I make my mind up to do it that they can stop me?

    I mean really? Do you think you can stop a determined individual?

  • justa
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    I'm sure that will be decided if they want to pursue it. I doubt they will, since getting to the truth isn't going to lead where they want, they would much prefer the illusion of wrongdoing to the actuality of some lower level person exceeding his authority, or even just finding that the TEA Party didn't fill out the forms properly.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    Compulsion is force of one kind or another. The fifth amendment says you can not be compelled to testify against yourself.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    She and her lawyer screwed the proverbial pooch.

    She voided her right to invoke the 5th by making that statement.

    She will testify, one way or another

  • mom
    Lv 6
    8 years ago

    It has happened before, mostly to the press corps who have refused to answer questions about their sources.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    5th Amendment MEANS 5th Amendment...I think thats that neo-conserativism thats talking...you know, how they LOVE the US Constitution, but once tradegy strikes they become delusional about it and pass the PATRIOT Act(which obama extended).

    same with libtards with sandy hook and gun control, but it failed miserably, like most of libtard policy.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.