people who think evolution is wrong...?

@ david G. Really? that's your big paper to debunk evolution? a hollow and... really really poorly worded non-joke? that's how you define yourself?

enjoy your two points, child.

@feed your faith starve your fears. Heh... you really don't have a clue how evolution works, do you?

why is it such a constant that the people arguing against evolution haven't the slightest inkling to research it? to understand the theory and THEN to consider a way of debunking it?

and when has a bible verse ever enhanced human's technological or philosophical progress?

@ talking faces. Wow... there are stupid people and then there's you. first, your grammar, go back to homeschool. second, how do you suggest we go back to before the starting point of the universe and see what happens, you strange little creature? and what is this theory of everything you go on about? here's a tip: don't try to involve yourself in science, you only come off looking like a rabbit little dog with a half baked and malformed opinion.

the kind of opinion that comes out, limps and shouts "kill me!"

now, in answering the actual question... well I have to implicitly agree with my colleague HUNGRY AND HORNY [face the truth], Sasuke should indeed have his posterior handed to him by the superior and likeable character that is Naruto. as Sasuke's character is a weak little emo child with no redeeming qualities, no likeable parts to his persona other than being evil for the sake of evil, I think it should be Naruto's sworn duty to realise this situation and, rather than attempting to redeem his former friend, should stomp the whiney emo's head into the dirt, ditch the equally annoying Sakura and shack up with that adorably shy cutie with obvious romantic feelings... who's name slips my mind.

I hope I have answered your question and that we've all elarned something from this:

christians are incapable of understanding science, the force that drives humanity and Naruto should whoop sasuke's ***.

That's not going to happen because there is a lot of data to back up evolution theory. Genetic changes are being followed by scientists. Beneficial mutations have been identified.

There is of course the problem that all religious people point out : there are no examples of one species turning into "something else" but there are cases where sufficient changes has resulting in one group being unable to reproduce with another group. I think this is called speciation. (I'm not a biologist)

And if you really want to see one thing turning into "something else", then stay alive for a few million years. I'll just stick with what the fossil record suggests : simple organisms evolve into more complex organisms.

Because it wouldn't be a research paper, and anyone with half a brain would refuse to read their utter sh*t spewed on a sheet of paper and masqueraded around intellectual institutes as anything but bias trite.

Therefore it would not go through the peer review process, and no scientific periodical would publish it UNLESS they had a sense of humor and their next issue was released on April 1st or something of that nature.

And no one has ever won the Noble Prize for regurgitating their pastor's bronze-age dogma; we certainly should not start handing them out for that crap now.

@ Feed your Faith: "if you can tell me right now the proof you have that only ONE animal or plant changed completely into another species, I will accept your evolution. Not adapted to climate or environment as God made, but actually went from one animal to another."

Do you realize that nowhere in the evolutionary theory does it say that any "animal or plant changed completely into another species"?

Seriously, where do you guys come up with this stuff?

"Not adapted to climate or environment..." - but that is a big part of evolution! The necessity of life itself to change in order to survive the fluctuating nature of any, and every, ecosystem!

"...as God made" - and there your entire argument fell apart. A word to the wise, chief: if you want a straight answer on evolutionary theory, stick with the natural world and leave the supernatural world where it belongs.

Evolution? Consider a Tad Pole. There are Millions of hybrid animals in existence through out time. I don't get involved in Creation and Evolution debates because both have existed and ran parallel to each other through out the whole Universe and time.

at the beginning, you are able to even have self belief in advent devoid of being a "creationist". Creationist have self belief that God created the universe in seven days or twenty 4 hour classes. in spite of the obtrusive contradictions present day interior the observable universe, this concept additionally contradicts the meaning of the Hebrew be conscious "day". That be conscious purely skill a "quantity of time" that may selection in length. We use comparable expression as quickly as we state "back interior the day" or in "in my granpa's day". So "creationism" no longer in undemanding terms is going against the information available on the instant, notwithstanding if it additionally is going against God's be conscious. Your quarrel seems with "creationists", notwithstanding if many properly knowledgeable, undemanding human beings even have self belief interior the Bible's account of the commencing up of the universe, the Earth, and mankind. My faith interior the Bible is great and in line with many factors, which incorporate the clever fee of the understanding contained in it. The Bible needless to say states that interior the commencing up "God created the heavens and the Earth". i think that he did, and technological know-how, whilst used and examined somewhat is of an identical opinion with me. One extreme conflict of words I even have with evolution is easy logic. in case you have been to stumble upon a appealing living house interior the midst of a field, you won't assume that it substitute into there by twist of destiny. The universe's complicated team spirit and innate splendor far surpasses something any human ought to layout or build, yet a lot of human beings declare that it got here approximately by twist of destiny. it is purely no longer logical. another flaw is that evolution isn't observable in present day guy. Evolution is meant to progression interior the variety of valuable mutations that bypass on features that improve a species and reason it to finally rework right into a sturdy creature, animal, what have you ever. notwithstanding scientific technological know-how is promptly advancing, mutations among human beings are almost continuously unfavorable. the place is the information of evolution among mankind? Why are we no longer growing to be greater suitable, figuring out to purchase features that permit us to stay to tell the story in this changing international? Why can we nevertheless kill devoid of reason or reason, why can we no longer fix even the finest of subject concerns confronting us? the place is evolution on the instant?

I agree , the religious should forget talking snakes and all their bullshi* and put your money where your mouth is and de-bunk evolution writing a paper.

if the religious books had more proof and not written like a pre-school story (talking snakes and foliage) it might actually receive more serious attention.

Why bother to convert religious fanatics?

They don't want to believe in evolution so let them believe in god.

And if we don't understand something yet it does not mean it's because god did it.

There are many things we still do not understand and it,s certainly does not mean it's god work.

They'll just say the institution is full of evolutionists who adhere to some sworn code to deny creationism. All crackpots say that.

evidence that the big bang didn't happen:

so,the universe was all a big cluster,and it exploded into perfectly spaced planets and galaxies?it put the earth in the right spot where you wouldn't freeze to death,or burn to death...WHAT THE HECK?!??!

The Bible

evidence evolution didn't happen:

monkeys are smart,but how did we get this knowledge?Also,the Bible

This movie should get the Grammy, or Oscar or something. Totally debunks.... something.