Why are the so adamently refusing to consider Hannah Anderson as anything except an innocent child/victim?

Hannah is 16 YEARS OLD!!!!!!!!!

She is a minor

Under the laws of the State of California, she is to be protected to the maximum extent possible. That means that it will take a warrant for her arrest, and then a ruling by a court that she be tried as an adult, before ANYTHING about her case can be released.

The Sheriff has gone as far as he can legally go, stating that she is a victim. He absolutly cannot say any more.

Even her name would be secret, but for the Amber Alert.

You are looking for things that you will not be allowed to find out until the girl is of legal age and asks that the records be opened and released

So you are just going to have to take the Sheriff's word at face value, because that is all you are going to get

Maybe it's the letters she wrote to Dimaggio & the 13 calls between them on the day of the murders..or the private trips the two took; or the face that she remarked "we're in trouble now", when the pair was discovered. Then again it could just be the smiling pictures she took of herself on social media after "learning" her mom & brother were dead.

There's much more to this case than meets the eye. Much more.

Also..there is up to a 4 hour window between the time Dimaggio picked her up from cheerleading practice - to the time of the fire. For her to claim no knowledge of the murders; and no apparent sorrow over her loss, does lead one to question just what her role was in the gruesome deaths.

Sweetie, You are treading on very delicate masculine /totally patriarchial territory.

What is SACRED to a MAN? A man will break his back, work his hands to the bone doing hard work for HIS FAMILY.

If a man's own best friend becomes a traitor and turns against him- kills his wife and son, kidnaps his young daughter- NO MAN WILL SIT BACK AND ALLOW THAT TO GO UNPUNISHED.

E|ven if lets say you may be right in your vile suggestion that the female child may have a part in all of this, the BEST FRIEND SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER AND MADE DECISIONS WITH HIS FRIEND IN MIND.

This was an adult and a child. and the adult betrayed a bond between man and another man,brothers by choice of company- unforgivable even in the dawn of mankind when we were all living in caves and armed with spears and rocks.

What you are suggesting is IRRELEVANT as there are primal rules between man and his fellow man.

I have some of the same questions... except I believe she knows more than she is telling.

-Maybe it's because They don't WANT to Know that she's NOT as "Innocent"- as They wish She Were... :(