Why do anti-life atheists assume unborns aren't full humans when the bible says otherwise?

The Bible also says that every animal in the world went on a boat and that snakes and donkeys can talk.

Pro-choice is not "anti-life."

And atheism has nothing to do with a stance on abortion.

That verse does NOT say what you seem to think it does -- it says nothing about a "full human."

Finally, if you'd ever seen a 1-month, 2-month, or even 4-month zygote, embryo, or fetus you wouldn't need to ask the question. They're *clearly* not "full humans." That's why they take 9 months to develop in the womb, genius.

Then how come in Leviticus 27:6 a child is only given value when it is a month old? Or in Numbers 3:15 only males that were a month old or older were counted as people in a census?

"Unborns" aren't full humans and that is an assertion. From a book. Written over 2 millennia ago. By a bunch of illiterate goat fúckers.

You can agree with it all you want, it doesn't make it right or true.

And what authority does this book have?

You want to stop abortions? Run for whatever you have as a parliament. Don't expect to be elected unless you can rig the vote.

But that's too hard, isn't it? So you blather on about bibles and other nonsense.

Yeah?

And before My future son forms into a human I know what he's going to form into. What is your point?

Numbers 5:27

"If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse."

The buybull also says to mark your slave by driving an awl through his ear...you don't do THAT, do you?

That is actually a reference to reincarnation.