Who is as worried as I am?

Regardless of the UNI am convinced the west is being sucked in to support Muslim terrorists.

The kind who execute unarmed police conscripts, unarmed prisoners are beaten and murdered, catholic priests are be headed, and the videos are posted in YouTube to satisfy the blood list if like minded terrorists.

Assad has no need to commit these gas attacks....the 'rebels' have everything to gain....and looking at some of the footage I doubt much is genuine.

Propaganda and lies are the norm in this part of the world.

I'm as much against this as I was about the war in Iraq - what Assad is doing goes against human rights and everything that the UN stands for.

Hague (and his predecessors) are doing are ignoring the wider issue and that is that the UN is flawed, anyone of the 5 permanent members have a veto - these 5 are the victors in WW2 and it gives them disproportionate amount of power.

Economically 2 of these 5 are making money by supplying goods, service and probably arms to Syria and therefore supporting the Assad regime and therefore will never give a mandate to stop him.

It is now time to rewrite the rules of membership of the UN and remove the veto - give all countries an equal say and work as one world to stop these situations from happening.

If Hague wants to resolve the issue he needs to do what others haven't and propose fundamental changes to the UN - however that means he needs to give up the UK's veto and I don't think the UK is ready for that yet.

I'm not worried it's their conflict not ours, top brass won't be itching to send troops or ships over under the guise of a humanitarian occupation. Once boots are on the ground it's an occupation and it's likely the rebels and government forces would resolve their own differences and attack us once we start liberating them from all of that nasty oil.

I'm worried.

Government have been busy retiring off the cream of our armed forces, are we actually going to have enough trained proficient man-power to enter a long & chaotic conflict?

I think not.

I say we go in providing we get some territory over in the Middle East which will prove quite strategic in the inevitable conflict with nuclear Iran.

Kerry was against war when Vietnam was going on. He is a traitor to our Vietnam Veterans, and to this Country. I was upset at the hypocrisy coming from this man, when I heard his speech today. Mitt Romney was right when he said to Obama - You only pick losers (John Kerry is one of those losers). We need to stay out of Syria's ''CIVIL WAR''.

''John Kerry - Anti-War Speech (1971) [short clip]''

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yixdveuf0GQ

I'm shaking in my boots

WW3 is on its way!!