Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are we living in the land of the dead?
Here it is the dead which gives life to the living.
Isn't the one who gives life the one who rules over the living?
Is this life ruled by death?
@Move on -- I think most will argue that a slave's life is dependent upon their Master.
@Maximus - Why does it take two to create life? Does it not take one cell to form another?
@Nick -- Let us remove the master/slave dynamic and replace it with a new.
Isn't the one who gives work the one who rules over the working? For if one gives, can it not take away? Death does indeed give life as it does take it away.
@Jesere -- "If the One who gives Life rules over the Living then women would be revered in the World..." But a lone woman does not create life, and from where did the woman receive hers?
@HealthyFur -- Yeast feeds on sugars. I do not know of any sugars that are alive.
No matter, even if we consume the living, they must perish to be converted to life.
@Apple -- the dead can't "keep itself alive" on its own accord, because it is not alive to begin with.
@seagul -- We consume the dead for energy, usually what was once alive. We convert the dead into life when eating.
10 Answers
- 8 years agoFavorite Answer
Too expand on each:
The Dead only Make Room for new life to evolve.
Only the 'Living' can 'give physical life'; whereas, Death only takes it away.
Death to the Body, is only the cessation, and departure of Biostatic Charges contained within; the essence of 'You'; or, the 'Self'.
The 'Self' will move on. Take my word for it, for I have been there.
The 'one' that gives life does not exist; as it takes Two too create it.
The Two that create it, will 'rule' over it, until it is time for 'it' too move on and perpetuate the species.
Death will never 'rule' life; however, it will remain a 'shadow' that will follow life, and can 'spring' without warning.
Note: A Slaves life will be dependent on what ever they need too do to survive.
In essence, we are all 'slaves' to 'something'; even if it is only to ourselves.
Added: Yea, sure; that is, if you are an Asexual Being, like a Flatworm; however, I do not believe that I should go through the Physics of Procreation. You can not deny that, even at the cellular level, it still takes Two cells too combine the genes in order too continue evolution and propagate a species.
Please stop referring to 'Death' giving 'Life'. In the Physical Realm, Death of the Body is finite; however, the "Existence", not 'life', of the Spirit will move on; as the Spirit knows not of Death.
I am an Empath, and a NDE survivor. I have a personal relationship with 'Death' and know its most intimate secrets, of which, you have yet too discover. I will expand no further.
Added- Day 3: Arc'; yes there is the aspect of Humans/Animals needing too 'Eat'; I love dead Cow too a Medium Rare. Dead Pig, with Chicken Zygotes, and Fungus sautéed in Milk Fat; Yum. A well Roasted Dead Bird is delectable. I haven't even touched on all the Dead Fish and Dead Coruscations I like too ingest.
But, when you are dealing with Homosapiens; that is a whole different ball game.
In that aspect, death will only 'sustain' life, not create it, or rule over it.
Comment?
- JesereLv 77 years ago
No
But Apathy is growing exponentially and that's close to being dead
The dead give life to only some of the Living not all...
It is called fertilizer and it stinks most of the time
If the One who gives Life rules over the Living
then women would be revered in the World...
I think you mean
Those who have Domination and Power
over others Lives Rule Most of the Living...
No this Life is NOT ruled By Death
But Death is the Only Way Out
- nicoLv 67 years ago
very interesting question...
in the same vein, one can say also that life rules death
if life disappears, death disappears.
life is death, death is life. they are one thing
I am life, and I am death, living
death lives...
no matter how alive something is, it is death,
and no matter how dead something is, it is still a little bit alive
in a philosophical sense...
http://www.chrismeistre.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2...
about the master/slave dynamic...
in any relationship, both are master and both are slave
it is easy to see how the slave is the slave and the master, master.
but look at it upside down, shift the perspective
the slave rules the master
the master is a slave to the "slave", and the slave is master of the "master"
it is mutual dependency taken to an extreme
"Every seeking gets guided beforehand by what is sought"
―Martin Heidegger
What you seek is seeking you ―Rumi
I hope this is what you wanted,
I hope this is what you had in mind,
cause this is what you're getting...
(Tool - Ticks and Leeches)
only ostensibly does the one who provides, rule. it can take away what it provides, but not fully. it must give for it to live. as for example, a business. the ceo can fire all his employees, but then the business will die. it is the same situation for existence. if death is the ceo, and life is its "employees"... if death took all life, or "fired all its employees," death too would cease to exist. in a sense, death does give life, but things can always be looked at deeper. ones rulership is dependent on something to rule. dependent. in a fundamental sense, death does not give life, it is life
- Move onLv 77 years ago
Interesting analogy. But No. That which gives life, is the source of life is not usually the Ruler. Slaves gave life to Kings and Queens. The meek are sheeple and although they are destine to Rule, do not at this time.
Additional: "Dependent", again, no. If that were so then a slave would not survive without their master and we both know this to be not true as many slaves had lives before slavery and many had lives after slavery. So, they may argue the point but I would find it hard to substantiate the claim.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 7 years ago
Mr Architect, have you ever made Sourdough bread?
First you create a starter... a mass of gunk which is alive with yeast culture... then you add the ingredients, keep a little aside for the next starter and bake the bread. The 'starter' can be kept for centuries, the same yeast culture giving birth to thousands of loaves of bread over hundreds of years.
In the same way, a woman named Henrietta Lacks was born with an immortal cell line. She's dead, depending on how you classify death, but she lives on in thousands of laboratories and has saved thousands, maybe millions of lives.
- Apple al.Lv 77 years ago
Negative.
This is our world and we are still here breathing.
Whatever we heard and saw before, is all guidelines
for us to live the present.
If the dead gives life to the living, why cant the dead
use to keep itself alive?
Death rules nobody, death is being told to come and fetch
us.
- Shahaf YefetLv 57 years ago
Dear Architect,
"Here it is the dead which gives life to the living"
I don't quite understand this statement, could you explain?
Biologically speaking, yes. Death is simply substence which we consume to survive. You call it "death" to make it sound philosophical.
Philosophically speaking, it is a matter of who brings purpose to who. Death has no philosophical rule over life, but life does rule the dead, philosophically, because it give death purpose.
are we living in the land of the dead?
I believe we are living in both realms. On one side we need death to aid us biologically, and on the other side we need life for purpose.
- ?Lv 77 years ago
Material existence is an entanglement of birth and death and ruled by the stringent laws of material nature. Life can only giving by life. Death is an infection of the eternal consciousness.