Which do you find more offensive?

Neither is offensive enough for me but i have to point out that both choices are hilarious !

Dan Savage's remark, by far and hmm no man has ever complained about how mine looks, funny they sure like spending a lot of time looking at it and other things. And the ones who have not seen it have spent a lot of time and effort hoping to see it. every guy I know is very turned on by how the vagina looks. I think Dan Savage is envious he probably has very ugly genitalia, also maybe he needs to give himself more reasons to be gay and calling vaginas ugly suit his needs. Wow I never met any men, in person, who would ever say such a thing. And too funny when I worked at a beach when I was 22 this older man ( he had to be at least in his late 60;s) but that dude brought up the subject of vaginas telling me some friend of his thought they were ugly, but he thought they were nice looking, I still to this day think he was hoping by saying that to me I was gonna let him see mine, nooooooooooooooooooo!. But Danny boy I guess either never actually saw one in the light of day, or maybe all he could get in his pre gay days were ugly chicks. Often the genitalia matches the face, it works with men too. I have dated some really nice men who had really nice genitalia and I have had, unfortunately had a few perverts expose themselves to me, quite a few were not good looking and eww neither were their packages, yikes!!!

I believe A) is what Robertson said.

I believe B) may be what Savage said.

But no matter what, its a free country. They're free to form their own opinions.

To me, Phil Robertson's a straight redneck from the swamps with a college degree and Dan Savage is a gaybe married to another man, from the big city.

I'll bet you, if you put Robertson and Savage in the cage of death together, one of them might die ... of fright.

I find your invocation of a false equivalency in order to argue that a rich bigot should not have to follow the same employment rules as the rest of us to be more offensive than either of the statements you provide as options.

At my last job, if I had done what Robertson did then I would've been fired immediately. Not "put on hiatus," but fired. Demanding special treatment for this faux redneck just because he is supposedly Christian is the height of myopic hypocrisy.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracke...

I thought the vagina looked more like a cut papya....papaya....sorry....

I don't agree with the canned ham analogy at all....it would explode everywhere....most unpleasant....

Alone, without a person attached to either, I believe both would turn my stomach....much like any other unattached human body part I'd have the misfortune of seeing.....

PS: the vagina also somewhat resembles a salmon steak...at least the drawing they had in health class looked just like a salmon steak

Excuse me. Back in a minute - I am just popping out to drop a can of ham off the roof.

@(((Toke)). In Australia they refer to the vagina as "the bearded clam".

If we are just comparing those two remarks obviously B is more offensive, however that ignorant duck bigot said a hell of a lot more then just that comment!

They are statements made by two disgusting adolescents.

If they were both my employees, I would find both of them possibly offensive to my company's earnings.

B, simply because I am female.